Untangling the Mess of Technological Artifacts

Bødker, Susanne; Lyle, Peter; Saad-Sulonen, Joanna

doi:10.1145/3083671.3083675

Cited by 26 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Following this conceptualisation, Jung et al proposed that a person's ecology of artefacts can be defined as the set of artefacts that a person owns, interacts with and uses [22]. A person's artefact ecology might include solely digital artefacts [4,22]; or both digital and non-digital [8]. Recently, Erkut and Serafin [17] proposed the idea of sonic artefact ecologies to analyse the relation of sounds in different computational objects.…”

Section: Human Actors and Artefact Ecologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Designing interactive sonic artefacts for dance performance

Masu

Correia

Jürgens³

et al. 2020

Proceedings of the 15th International Audio Mostly Conference

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper, we propose to consider the sonic interactions that occurs in a dance performance from an ecological perspective. In particular, we suggest using the conceptual models of artefact ecology and design space. As a case study, we present a work developed during a two weeks artistic residency in collaboration between a sound designer, one choreographer, and two dancers. During the residency both an interactive sound artefact based on a motion capture system, and a dance performance were developed. We present the ecology of an interactive sound artefact developed for the dance performance, with the objective to analyse how the ecology of multiple actors relate themselves to the interactive artefact. CCS CONCEPTS • Human-centered computing → Interaction design process and methods; Empirical studies in interaction design; • Applied computing → Sound and music computing; Performing arts.

show abstract

Section: Human Actors and Artefact Ecologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Designing interactive sonic artefacts for dance performance

Masu

Correia

Jürgens³

et al. 2020

Proceedings of the 15th International Audio Mostly Conference

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In various works [3,8,9,11,17], Bødker et al developed artefact ecologies to address the ways in which multiplicities of use, users and artefacts come together within and across activities. This work was inspired by Jung et al [29], who defined a personal ecology of interactive artefacts as a set of interactive artefacts that a person owns, has access to, and uses (p. 201), and extended to also consider communities by Bødker et al [12][13][14].…”

Section: Activity Theory Triangles Ecologies and The Hammentioning

confidence: 99%

Designing a game to explore human artefact ecologies for assistive robotics

Kobbelgaard

Bødker

Kanstrup

2020

Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper concerns the creation of design games made to explore and uncover the daily lives and artefact ecologies of users living with paralysis from the neck down. The paper reviews previous notable literature on making design games and presents a novel approach for basing a design game on an activity theoretical framework named the Human Artefact Model. After discussing the creation of the games, the paper reflects on the results and experiences attained whilst using the design games to gather data in the wild. Last, this paper proposes several points of attention to reflect upon when creating design games based on formal theories. CCS CONCEPTS • Human-centred computing → Interaction design; Interaction design process and methods; Participatory design.

show abstract

“…Their analysis is based on a self-organised community, not bound by expectations from a funding body, and that allowed for an ad-hoc, flexible approach [4,5,6], where the community members themselves conducted the infrastructuring work, developing tools for themselves. Regarding infrastructuring, it is indeed possible to go beyond the locally rooted and self-organised community to refer to dispersed populations interested in similar issues.…”

Section: Strategies and Tacticsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Fostering Commonfare. Infrastructuring Autonomous Social Collaboration

Lyle¹,

Sciannamblo²,

Teli³

2018

Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recently, HCI scholars have started questioning the relationship between computing and political economy, with both general analyses of such relationships, and specific design cases describing design interventions. This paper contributes to this stream of reflections, and argues that IT designers and HCI scholars can critically engage with the contemporary phase of capitalism by infrastructuring the emergence of new institutional forms of autonomous social collaboration through IT projects. More specifically, we discuss strategies and tactics that are available for IT designers embracing an activist agenda while infrastructuring autonomous social collaborations. We draw on empirical data from an H2020 EU funded project -Commonfare -that seeks to foster the emergence of alternative forms of welfare provision rooted in social collaboration. In this context, we discuss how the necessary multiple relations that unfold in a project with such ambitions shape both the language and the technologies of the project itself.

show abstract

Untangling the Mess of Technological Artifacts

Cited by 26 publications

References 22 publications

Designing interactive sonic artefacts for dance performance

Designing interactive sonic artefacts for dance performance

Designing a game to explore human artefact ecologies for assistive robotics

Fostering Commonfare. Infrastructuring Autonomous Social Collaboration

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About