2016
DOI: 10.4018/ijcallt.2016010102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untangling Multimedia Effects on EFL Incidental Vocabulary Learning via Playing an Online Hidden-Object Game

Abstract: The present empirical study examined the efficacy of coupling L1 or L2 definitions with pictorial glosses on incidental vocabulary learning when L2 learners exclusively play a purposely designed hidden-object game. Elementary EFL learners (n= 162) took a vocabulary pretest and a picture recognition test (PRT) and a word recognition test (WRT) immediately after playing the game, and again two weeks later. ANOVA analyses were conducted to measure vocabulary acquisition and retention. The findings revealed that t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In studies that used independent TMVD with a control group, experimental groups 2 were compared with (a) independent learning without technology (n = 10), (b) a different technology-mediated approach (n = 8), (c) teachermediated learning without technology (n = 5) or (d) no learning (n = 2), in the control group. Examples of using different independent TMVD treatments include those where experimental groups received some form of additional language support, e.g., meaning-focused engagement with newscasts, with and without additional languagefocused activities (Marefat & Hassanzadeh, 2016), or playing a digital game with and without access to word definitions (Alghamdi, 2016), and studies that compared two different types of technologies, e.g., vocabulary development from playing a digital simulation game and that from a flashcard game (Franciosi et al, 2016). When experimental groups used teacher-plus-technology-mediated learning, and there was a control group, the most common comparison was drawn between treatments that used technology and those that did not (aka "traditional" approach).…”
Section: Learning and Instructional Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In studies that used independent TMVD with a control group, experimental groups 2 were compared with (a) independent learning without technology (n = 10), (b) a different technology-mediated approach (n = 8), (c) teachermediated learning without technology (n = 5) or (d) no learning (n = 2), in the control group. Examples of using different independent TMVD treatments include those where experimental groups received some form of additional language support, e.g., meaning-focused engagement with newscasts, with and without additional languagefocused activities (Marefat & Hassanzadeh, 2016), or playing a digital game with and without access to word definitions (Alghamdi, 2016), and studies that compared two different types of technologies, e.g., vocabulary development from playing a digital simulation game and that from a flashcard game (Franciosi et al, 2016). When experimental groups used teacher-plus-technology-mediated learning, and there was a control group, the most common comparison was drawn between treatments that used technology and those that did not (aka "traditional" approach).…”
Section: Learning and Instructional Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rapid growth of technology has disrupted various aspects of human life, including in the care of children. Alghamdi (2016) found that even though technology has benefits in increasing knowledge and facilitating access to educational and learning resources, technology has disadvantages including influencing personal life, relationships with others, and early childhood health. The results The concept of child-care by parents who must activate hands-on is greatly erode by the increasing frequency of children using digital media.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the teacher should carefully design the course content to be appropriate for online display. 25,26 Furthermore, course activities and evaluations should be thoroughly considered because planning an online course may differ from planning for a face-to-face classroom. Hazaea et al emphasized the need to make online learning programs more user-friendly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%