2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2007.01877.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unsuspected osteomyelitis is frequent in persistent diabetic foot ulcer and better diagnosed by MRI than by 18F‐FDG PET or 99mTc‐MOAB

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In diabetic-foot patients with clinically suspected osteomyelitis, 18 F-FDG PET showed an only slightly lower sensitivity than MRI for the detection of osteomyelitis but a higher specificity (81% and 93% as compared with 91% and 78%, respectively) (14), whereas in diabetic-foot patients without clinical suspicion of osteomyelitis, MRI was clearly superior (13). On the basis of these results, PET seems to be complementary to MRI and may be used as an alternative to MRI after plain radiography as a screening method (14).…”
Section: Imaging Of Infectious Diseases Osteomyelitismentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In diabetic-foot patients with clinically suspected osteomyelitis, 18 F-FDG PET showed an only slightly lower sensitivity than MRI for the detection of osteomyelitis but a higher specificity (81% and 93% as compared with 91% and 78%, respectively) (14), whereas in diabetic-foot patients without clinical suspicion of osteomyelitis, MRI was clearly superior (13). On the basis of these results, PET seems to be complementary to MRI and may be used as an alternative to MRI after plain radiography as a screening method (14).…”
Section: Imaging Of Infectious Diseases Osteomyelitismentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In diabetic patients, PET with 18 F-FDG may be at a disadvantage because peripheral insulin resistance might cause decreased uptake at the site of inflammation (13). In diabetic-foot patients with clinically suspected osteomyelitis, 18 F-FDG PET showed an only slightly lower sensitivity than MRI for the detection of osteomyelitis but a higher specificity (81% and 93% as compared with 91% and 78%, respectively) (14), whereas in diabetic-foot patients without clinical suspicion of osteomyelitis, MRI was clearly superior (13).…”
Section: Imaging Of Infectious Diseases Osteomyelitismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors concluded that 18 F-FDG PET can be used for diagnosis of diabetes-related infection and that PET/CT enables accurate differentiation between osteomyelitis and softtissue infection (2). Only 1 study, published by Schwegler et al, found disappointing results for 18 F-FDG PET, with MRI being superior to 18 F-FDG PET and to 99m Tc-labeled monoclonal antigranulocyte antibody scintigraphy (19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schwegler et al (52). reported that 18 F-FDG PET detected 2 of 7 cases (29% sensitivity) of osteomyelitis.…”
Section: Diabetic Pedal Osteomyelitismentioning
confidence: 99%