2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2004.10.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unsupervised spike sorting with ICA and its evaluation using GENESIS simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finding the number of neurons is usually done manually during spike sorting-it is an unsupervised clustering problem where the number of the clusters is unknown. Approaches and solutions for both problems are difficult to evaluate quantitatively, due to a lack of knowledge about the truth behind the experimental data [14].…”
Section: Spike Detection and Sortingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finding the number of neurons is usually done manually during spike sorting-it is an unsupervised clustering problem where the number of the clusters is unknown. Approaches and solutions for both problems are difficult to evaluate quantitatively, due to a lack of knowledge about the truth behind the experimental data [14].…”
Section: Spike Detection and Sortingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider only a single-channel recording, but the spikesorting algorithms that are commonly applied on singlechannel recordings are applicable on multi-channel recordings as well, usually as a combination with some source separation methods (for examples see [4] and [5]). Say we have a single-channel extracellular neural recording that consists of N samples and let each spike have a duration of M samples.…”
Section: Common Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, there are thousands of neurons in human body, and the spike waveforms generated by different neutrons are different, which is the physiological basis for spike sorting [1]. Several methods of spike sorting have been put forward in the past work, such as clustering analysis [1,2], artificial neural network [3,4], templates matching [5], SVM(Support Vector Machine) [6][7][8], ICA(Independent Component Analysis) [9] ,etc. The classification results are often unsatisfactory when these methods are directly used to raw spike data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%