2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.comcom.2012.01.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unsupervised Network Intrusion Detection Systems: Detecting the Unknown without Knowledge

Abstract: Traditional Network Intrusion Detection Systems (NIDSs) rely on either specialized signatures of previously seen attacks, or on expensive and difficult to produce labeled traffic datasets for user-profiling to hunt out network attacks. Despite being opposite in nature, both approaches share a common downside: they require the knowledge provided by an external agent, either in terms of signatures or as normal-operation profiles. In this paper we present UNIDS, an Unsupervised Network Intrusion Detection System … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
95
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 217 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The performance of the proposed approach is evaluated through experiments using the well-known KDD Cup 1999 data set and further experiments using the honeypot data recently collected fro m Kyoto University. It is shown that the proposed approach significantly increase the detection rate while the false alarm rate remains lo w. Casas P et al [33] has proposed an unsupervised network intrusion detection system. Proposed method was evaluated on three different traffic datasets, including the well-known KDD dataset as well as real t raffic t races fro m two operational networks.…”
Section: Powers S T Et Al [24]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of the proposed approach is evaluated through experiments using the well-known KDD Cup 1999 data set and further experiments using the honeypot data recently collected fro m Kyoto University. It is shown that the proposed approach significantly increase the detection rate while the false alarm rate remains lo w. Casas P et al [33] has proposed an unsupervised network intrusion detection system. Proposed method was evaluated on three different traffic datasets, including the well-known KDD dataset as well as real t raffic t races fro m two operational networks.…”
Section: Powers S T Et Al [24]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Training a supervised classifier like Naive Bayes requires labelling the training data. According to P. Casas, J. Mazel, and P. Owezarski [10], this task is time consuming and complex. Increase in training data translates into increase in training cost due to labelling for large multidimensional data set like kdd 99 benchmark dataset.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pedro Casas et al [11] detected new attack (unknown) without knowledge of any signature, labelled data or training. For that purpose, unsupervised network IDS use outlier detection method which is based on subspace clustering and multiple evidence accumulation method for various network intrusion and attack.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%