2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.neo.2022.100869
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unsupervised machine learning using K-means identifies radiomic subgroups of pediatric low-grade gliomas that correlate with key molecular markers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Radiomics has the ability to capture the breadth of heterogeneity in each tumor to aide in clinical treatment. Unsupervised techniques using radiomic feature clusterings in pediatric low grade gliomas correlate with molecular alterations [12]. In our study, we extracted interpretable tumor characteristics derived from shape, size, and texture features.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiomics has the ability to capture the breadth of heterogeneity in each tumor to aide in clinical treatment. Unsupervised techniques using radiomic feature clusterings in pediatric low grade gliomas correlate with molecular alterations [12]. In our study, we extracted interpretable tumor characteristics derived from shape, size, and texture features.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may enable more confidence for empiric treatment with targeted therapies if tissue diagnosis is infeasible. pLGG mutational classification has been previously attempted in a few studies, most with manual segmentation-derived and/or pre-engineered radiomics (35)(36)(37)(38), which are known to fail when applied to the external dataset. Radiomic features have been extracted from MRI images and fitted to classifiers models like XGboost and SVM (17,35,36).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, 41/62 of the reviewed studies (66%) focused on predicting IDH mutation and 1p/19q codeletion status only, while 33 studies (53%) analyzed other molecular subgroups. These were TERT [9,37,[40][41][42][43][44][45][46], ATRX [8,[47][48][49][50][51], H3K27 [4,[15][16][17][18], MGMT [50,[52][53][54][55], P53 [8,16,51,53], CDKN2A/B [12,30,35,56], EGFR [36], chr7/10 [57] and BRAF alterations [3,[5][6][7]. The reported AUC values range from 0.6 to 0.98 for these predictions with an average of 0.82 to 0.9.…”
Section: Molecular Subgroupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies analyzed adult populations and high-grade gliomas, with only five studies (8%) analyzing pediatric populations [3][4][5][6][7], ten studies (16%) analyzing low-grade glioma [3,5,6,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14] and only four studies (6%) focusing on diffuse midline glioma [15][16][17][18]. Data on the analyzed patient population are shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Patient Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%