2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2022.106585
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unsupervised machine learning and geometric morphometrics as tools for the identification of inter and intraspecific variations in the Anopheles Maculipennis complex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To determine population structure, we used UMAP software (with Russell-Rao distance metric) on the multi-sample VCF, followed by application of HDBSCAN (v0.8.28) 51 , 52 to determine sample clustering (see 53 55 for recent applications). This work was performed in python (v3.7.6), with scripts available from https://github.com/AntonS-bio/resistance-AedesAegypti .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine population structure, we used UMAP software (with Russell-Rao distance metric) on the multi-sample VCF, followed by application of HDBSCAN (v0.8.28) 51 , 52 to determine sample clustering (see 53 55 for recent applications). This work was performed in python (v3.7.6), with scripts available from https://github.com/AntonS-bio/resistance-AedesAegypti .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine population structure, we used UMAP software (with Russell-Rao distance metric) on the multi-sample VCF, followed by application of HDBSCAN (v0.8.28) (51,52) to determine sample clustering (see (53)(54)(55) for recent applications). This work was performed in python (v3.7.6), with scripts available from https://github.com/AntonS-bio/resistance-AedesAegypti.…”
Section: Population Genetics Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%