2022
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.105.235136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unsupervised learning of interacting topological and symmetry-breaking phase transitions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 5(d) shows the first derivative of the CrossArea with respect to the temperature, and the estimated phase transition points from the maximum gradient are T c /J = 1.0 and T c /J = 0.9 for L = 16 and L = 32, respectively. Note that similar to other unsupervised machine learning methods for phase transition detection [18,19,21,[48][49][50][51][52], a detailed error estimation on the predicted T c is not available. However, the convergence of the predicted T c as the system size increases suggests the validity of the method.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 5(d) shows the first derivative of the CrossArea with respect to the temperature, and the estimated phase transition points from the maximum gradient are T c /J = 1.0 and T c /J = 0.9 for L = 16 and L = 32, respectively. Note that similar to other unsupervised machine learning methods for phase transition detection [18,19,21,[48][49][50][51][52], a detailed error estimation on the predicted T c is not available. However, the convergence of the predicted T c as the system size increases suggests the validity of the method.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 5 (d) shows the first derivative of the CrossArea with respect to the temperature and the estimated phase transition point from the maximum gradient is T c = 1.0 and T c = 0.9 for L = 16 and L = 32, respectively. Note that similar to other unsupervised machine learning methods of phase transition detection [18,19,21,[47][48][49][50][51], a detailed error estimation on the predicted T c is not available. However, the convergence of the predicted T c as the system size increases suggests the validity of the method.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also highlight that our empirical complexity results raise interesting questions about the complexity of learning an effective Hamiltonian description 32 , 62 , 63 of the measurement outcome distributions for monitored quantum systems. Finally, we note that improving our neural network algorithms to find the optimal decoder and investigating the applicability of unsupervised machine learning techniques for this problem is left for future studies 64 , 65 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%