2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.01021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unsupervised Learning for Robust Fitting: A Reinforcement Learning Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Machine learning is also used to solve various problems. Algorithms from machine learning are divided into three categories, which is supervised learning, unsupervised learning, and reinforcement learning [8].…”
Section: Studi Literature a Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning is also used to solve various problems. Algorithms from machine learning are divided into three categories, which is supervised learning, unsupervised learning, and reinforcement learning [8].…”
Section: Studi Literature a Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Partly buoyed by the dominance of deep learning in computer vision, learning-based solutions to robust geometric fitting have been developed [10,62,72]. Such techniques leverage statistics in large datasets to learn a mapping from the input instance to the desired solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this method is slow in general, despite speedups introduced by Cai et al [2]. In [25], an unsupervised learning approach was proposed to determine which point in a basis to remove in solving robust model fitting problems. This approach adopted the framework of reinforcement learning, where removing points are guided by maximising rewards.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like many learning based approaches, it may take a long time to train and it is hard to analyse the method and its ability to generalise. Like [25] and [24], modifications to the basic tree search that lose the priority queue guarantees of A * , sacrifice optimality guarantees for speed. This paper is also spiritually in that context.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%