2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/cvprw.2018.00156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unsupervised Features for Facial Expression Intensity Estimation Over Time

Abstract: The diversity of facial shapes and motions among persons is one of the greatest challenges for automatic analysis of facial expressions. In this paper, we propose a feature describing expression intensity over time, while being invariant to person and the type of performed expression. Our feature is a weighted combination of the dynamics of multiple points adapted to the overall expression trajectory. We evaluate our method on several tasks all related to temporal analysis of facial expression. The proposed fe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Automatic quantitative assessment of facial expression can be defined as the ability of a system to analyze facial cues and to give a numerical outcome describing how much the produced facial expression is similar to the expected one in an objective way. The lack of standard rules for expression intensity labeling and the limited availability of labeled data are the two most drawbacks in this research area that includes only a few recent pioneering works limited to a single expression [ 14 ], making use of 3D data [ 15 ] or requiring unrealistic constrained evolutions such as an initial neutral stage (with no expression) followed by the onset of expression ending with expression apex [ 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Automatic quantitative assessment of facial expression can be defined as the ability of a system to analyze facial cues and to give a numerical outcome describing how much the produced facial expression is similar to the expected one in an objective way. The lack of standard rules for expression intensity labeling and the limited availability of labeled data are the two most drawbacks in this research area that includes only a few recent pioneering works limited to a single expression [ 14 ], making use of 3D data [ 15 ] or requiring unrealistic constrained evolutions such as an initial neutral stage (with no expression) followed by the onset of expression ending with expression apex [ 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our method is free from data labeling cost by being an unsupervised feature learning approach. Note that there exist a few number of unsupervised approaches in the same and/or related topics, e.g., speech emotion recognition [30], [31], facial emotion recognition [32], facial expression intensity estimation [33], and multimodal sentiment and emotion analysis [25]. However, our method involves the deep architectures either pre-trained on tasks different from emotion recognition (e.g., action recognition) or not pre-trained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%