2023 IEEE 17th International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FG) 2023
DOI: 10.1109/fg57933.2023.10042627
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unsupervised Face Recognition using Unlabeled Synthetic Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pretrained model produced a synthetic face data for each latent vector that was randomly non-repeatedly generated based on Gaussian noise. These images were then filtered automatically by using the CR-FIQA [3] face image utility assessment approach, where extreme non-frontal poses and largely occluded images were mostly removed by removing the images with the lowest utility score. This helps simulate the real log-in face recognition scenario that is commonly targeted by PAs.…”
Section: Synthaspoof Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The pretrained model produced a synthetic face data for each latent vector that was randomly non-repeatedly generated based on Gaussian noise. These images were then filtered automatically by using the CR-FIQA [3] face image utility assessment approach, where extreme non-frontal poses and largely occluded images were mostly removed by removing the images with the lowest utility score. This helps simulate the real log-in face recognition scenario that is commonly targeted by PAs.…”
Section: Synthaspoof Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the main candidate solutions for this issue is the use of synthetic data [8]. This has been very recently and successfully proposed for the training of face recognition [4,5,30] and morphing attack detection [9,11,21], among other processes such as model quantization [2]. Synthetic data for PAD development has, besides the privacy and legal motivations, a major advantage when it comes to scale and diversity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For all of the methods, higher quality score output is intended to indicate higher biometric utility [1]. Six of these were modern deep learning models specifically intended to assess quality in terms of image utility [1] for face recognition: CR-FIQA(S) & CR-FIQA(L) [15] (respectively with iResNet50/iResNet100 backbone trained on CASIA-WebFace [16]/MS1MV2 [7], both with 112 × 112 input image size), MagFace [17] (iResNet100 backbone trained on MS1MV2 [7], 112 × 112 input image size), SER-FIQ [18] ("same model" variant using ArcFace, 112 × 112 input image size), FaceQnet-v0 [19] & FaceQnet-v1 [20] (both with ResNet-50 backbone, trained on VGGFace2 [21], 224 × 224 input image size). These six models are all publicly available.…”
Section: Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system used a StyleGAN network, pretrained without labeled data to train a prototypical network that can identify human faces. Paper [ 5 ] uses GAN-based augmentation, which learns to maximize the similarity between two augmented images of the same synthetic instance, leading to high recognition accuracy. The unsupervised autonomous learning system, which learns from a video sequence, is presented in paper [ 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%