2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-18576-3_22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unsupervised Entity Alignment Using Attribute Triples and Relation Triples

Abstract: Entity alignment aims to find entities referring to the same real-world object across different knowledge graphs (KGs). Most existing works utilize the relations between entities contained in the relation triples with embedding-based approaches, but require a large number of training data. Some recent attempt works on using types of their attributes in attribute triples for measuring the similarity between entities across KGs. However, due to diverse expressions of attribute names and non-standard attribute va… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As far as we know, the current embedding-based entity alignment methods mostly rely on the seed mappings, whose roles are introduces in Section 2.1, for supervised or semi-supervised learning. Specially, we can consider some heuristic rules with, for example, string and attribute matching to generate the seed mappings, as done by the method IMUSE (He et al, 2019), but the impact of the seed mappings is similar and the study of such impact also benefit the distant supervision methods.…”
Section: Seed Mappingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As far as we know, the current embedding-based entity alignment methods mostly rely on the seed mappings, whose roles are introduces in Section 2.1, for supervised or semi-supervised learning. Specially, we can consider some heuristic rules with, for example, string and attribute matching to generate the seed mappings, as done by the method IMUSE (He et al, 2019), but the impact of the seed mappings is similar and the study of such impact also benefit the distant supervision methods.…”
Section: Seed Mappingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We adopt twelve competitive KG alignment methods as the baselines. They can be categorized into (i) embedding-based models that include MTransE , IPTransE [Zhu et al, 2017], GCNAlign [Wang et al, 2018], BootEA , RSN4EA , IMUSE [He et al, 2019], MultiKE [Zhang et al, 2019], and RDGCN [Wu et al, 2019], (ii) conventional systems that include PARIS and LogMap, and (iii) two simple matching models using either the edit distance (denoted by STR-Match) or the word embedding similarity (denoted by EMB-Match) between entity names. We adopt the implementations of the embedding-based models from OpenEA [Sun et al, 2020] and also the same dataset division: 20%, 10%, and 70% of the entity mappings for training, validation, and testing, respectively.…”
Section: Experimental Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The merit lies in the capabilities of resolving the aforementioned heterogeneity and simplifying knowledge reasoning [36,88]. Motivated by such success, a new research field, called embedding-based entity alignment, has emerged [10] and attracted massive attention recently [8,9,25,29,66,80,81,84,89,92,102].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%