“…We adopt twelve competitive KG alignment methods as the baselines. They can be categorized into (i) embedding-based models that include MTransE , IPTransE [Zhu et al, 2017], GCNAlign [Wang et al, 2018], BootEA , RSN4EA , IMUSE [He et al, 2019], MultiKE [Zhang et al, 2019], and RDGCN [Wu et al, 2019], (ii) conventional systems that include PARIS and LogMap, and (iii) two simple matching models using either the edit distance (denoted by STR-Match) or the word embedding similarity (denoted by EMB-Match) between entity names. We adopt the implementations of the embedding-based models from OpenEA [Sun et al, 2020] and also the same dataset division: 20%, 10%, and 70% of the entity mappings for training, validation, and testing, respectively.…”