2019
DOI: 10.7554/elife.38471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unsupervised discovery of temporal sequences in high-dimensional datasets, with applications to neuroscience

Abstract: Identifying low-dimensional features that describe large-scale neural recordings is a major challenge in neuroscience. Repeated temporal patterns (sequences) are thought to be a salient feature of neural dynamics, but are not succinctly captured by traditional dimensionality reduction techniques. Here, we describe a software toolbox—called seqNMF—with new methods for extracting informative, non-redundant, sequences from high-dimensional neural data, testing the significance of these extracted patterns, and ass… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
117
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
117
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to emphasize that our method is an explicit clustering method, that can find unique patterns of network activity that are well separated from one another. Several methods using decomposition techniques like PCA or matrix factorization have been utilized with the goal of extracting patterns or sequences from neuronal ensemble data (Peyrache et al, 2009;Mackevicius et al, 2018;Lopes-dos-Santos, Ribeiro, and Tort, 2013;Stopfer, Jayaraman, and Laurent, 2003). We highlight several differences between SPOTDisClust and decomposition techniques: 1) In principle, decomposition techniques like PCA achieve a different goal, namely to identify components that explain a large fraction of variance in the data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to emphasize that our method is an explicit clustering method, that can find unique patterns of network activity that are well separated from one another. Several methods using decomposition techniques like PCA or matrix factorization have been utilized with the goal of extracting patterns or sequences from neuronal ensemble data (Peyrache et al, 2009;Mackevicius et al, 2018;Lopes-dos-Santos, Ribeiro, and Tort, 2013;Stopfer, Jayaraman, and Laurent, 2003). We highlight several differences between SPOTDisClust and decomposition techniques: 1) In principle, decomposition techniques like PCA achieve a different goal, namely to identify components that explain a large fraction of variance in the data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the proportion of hippocampal SPW-Rs that can be decoded as 'replay' events is small in the hippocampus (8-20%; Davidson; other REFS), we reasoned that perhaps some independent sequential structure in other hippocampal SPW-Rs may drive LS neuron firing. To examine this possibility, we took an unsupervised variance decomposition approach (Mackevicius et al, 2019). This method allowed us to extract sequential activity patterns from hippocampal SPW-Rs without relying on a pre-existing template.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recently developed unsupervised method of spatiotemporal quantification of neural populations was also used (Mackevicius et al, 2019). This method allows for the examination of consistently occurring neural sequences without relying on a behavioral 'template' to relate too.…”
Section: Spatiotemporal Patterns Of Population Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our analysis of population dynamics through modeling of spiking patterns using fine temporal windows, brings together the power of decomposition of spatio-temporal structure of population activity and detailed modeling of spiking patterns of large neural populations. This combination extends methods like tensor decomposition [63,64], as we provide an interpretable generative model and do not depend on metric based approaches, and machine learning based approaches for modeling spiking patterns as autoencoders (LFADS). More broadly, the current framework is easily applicable to other neural systems, and can be used to study the nature of sequences of states [18,19,65].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%