2014
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu758
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unsupervised discovery of information structure in biomedical documents

Abstract: The annotated corpus and software are available at http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/∼dk427/bio14info.html.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Guo et al (2015), clustering methods have been improved to identify the zones by extracting the latent topics from the articles and the sections. Moreover, in the special case of the abstracts of biology papers, Kiela et al (2014) used clustering approaches such as k-means and multi-level-weighted graph to obtain a high performance in zone identification; This is even more evident in zones like Objective, Result and Conclusion.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Guo et al (2015), clustering methods have been improved to identify the zones by extracting the latent topics from the articles and the sections. Moreover, in the special case of the abstracts of biology papers, Kiela et al (2014) used clustering approaches such as k-means and multi-level-weighted graph to obtain a high performance in zone identification; This is even more evident in zones like Objective, Result and Conclusion.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies in this area focus on improving automatic discourse parsing of scientific text, while some works also focus on the linguistic patterns and psychological effects of scientific argumentation (e.g., de Waard and Maat, 2012). A wide range of techniques have been used in prior work to parse scientific abstracts, from fully supervised techniques (Chung, 2009;Guo et al, 2010) to semi-supervised (Guo et al, 2011c;Guo et al, 2013) and unsupervised techniques (Kiela et al, 2015).…”
Section: Scientific Discourse Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most previous work on automatic analysis of information structure relies on supervised learning (Teufel and Moens, 2002;Burstein et al, 2003;Mizuta et al, 2006;Shatkay et al, 2008;Guo et al, 2010;Liakata et al, 2012;Markert et al, 2012). Given the prohibitive cost of manual annotation, unsupervised and minimally supervised techniques such as clustering (Kiela et al, 2014) and topic modeling (Varga et al, 2012;O Séaghdha and Teufel, 2014) are highly important. However, the performance of such approaches shows a large room for improvement.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%