2017
DOI: 10.1101/143701
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unsupervised clustering and epigenetic classification of single cells

Abstract: Characterizing epigenetic heterogeneity at the cellular level is a critical problem in the modern genomics era. Assays such as single cell ATAC-seq (scATAC-seq) offer an opportunity to interrogate cellular level epigenetic heterogeneity through patterns of variability in open chromatin. However, these assays exhibit technical variability that complicates clear classification and cell type identification in heterogeneous populations. We present scABC, an R package for the unsupervised clustering of single cell … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We compared scBFA against PCA, Binary PCA, Scasat 34 , Destin 35 and scABC 36 , Scasat and Destin are scATAC-seq analysis tools primarily designed to identify cell types and differential accessibility analysis. Both methods treat dimensionality reduction as prior step before further clustering distinct cell types.…”
Section: Execution Of Scrna-seq Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We compared scBFA against PCA, Binary PCA, Scasat 34 , Destin 35 and scABC 36 , Scasat and Destin are scATAC-seq analysis tools primarily designed to identify cell types and differential accessibility analysis. Both methods treat dimensionality reduction as prior step before further clustering distinct cell types.…”
Section: Execution Of Scrna-seq Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We performed dimensionality reduction and cell type classification experiments on several scATAC-seq datasets, analogous to our scRNA-seq analyses above. We benchmarked scBFA against PCA, Binary PCA, Scasat 34 , Destin 35 and scABC 36 . scBFA systematically outperformed all other methods in our benchmark datasets ( Fig.…”
Section: Detection Pattern Models Are Also Superior For Scatac-seq Damentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To test the performance of APEC, we first obtained data from previous publications that performed scATAC-seq on a variety of cell types with known identity during hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) differentiation 20 as a gold standard. Compared to other state-of-the-art single cell chromatin accessibility analysis methods such as chromVAR 17,21 , LSI 11,12 , Cicero 18 and cisTopic 19 , this new accesson-based algorithm more precisely and clearly clustered cells into their corresponding identities according to the Adjusted Rand Index (ARI) ( Fig. 1b-c).…”
Section: Accesson-based Algorithm Improves Single-cell Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Destin [21] applies weighted principal components and K-means clustering to the binary accessibility matrix to cluster cells. scABC [22] uses the read count matrix to cluster cells via a weighted K-medoids clustering algorithm. PRISM [23] uses the binary accessibility matrix to compute cosine distance between cells and then uses this distance to evaluate the degree of heterogeneity of a cell population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%