2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-04629-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unsupervised clustering and epigenetic classification of single cells

Abstract: Characterizing epigenetic heterogeneity at the cellular level is a critical problem in the modern genomics era. Assays such as single cell ATAC-seq (scATAC-seq) offer an opportunity to interrogate cellular level epigenetic heterogeneity through patterns of variability in open chromatin. However, these assays exhibit technical variability that complicates clear classification and cell type identification in heterogeneous populations. We present scABC, an R package for the unsupervised clustering of single-cell … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
88
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
88
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S4c), also exhibited a similar pattern of preferential binding to chromatin sequences captured by SNAREseq accessibility assay ( Fig. S4d), consistent with previous observations 8 . We improved the detection sensitivity on chromatin further by using NP40 based Nuclei EZ buffer to boost tagmentation efficiency and adding RNase inhibitor combination 9 to protect RNA from degradation.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…S4c), also exhibited a similar pattern of preferential binding to chromatin sequences captured by SNAREseq accessibility assay ( Fig. S4d), consistent with previous observations 8 . We improved the detection sensitivity on chromatin further by using NP40 based Nuclei EZ buffer to boost tagmentation efficiency and adding RNase inhibitor combination 9 to protect RNA from degradation.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…Cells in cluster 4 and 5 were mainly derived from E9.5, suggesting that they had reached a certain level of maturity. To obtain insights into the biological processes in specific CPC populations, we identified cluster-specific peaks (Supplementary Data 4 ) 34 and performed gene ontology analysis of genes that were close to (within ± 2.5 kb to TSSs) proximal, cluster-specific peaks. Cluster 1 was enriched for GO terms related to heart development and muscle contraction suggesting advanced cardiomyocyte differentiation, whereas cluster 5 showed enrichment of GO terms related to endothelial cells (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peaks were tested for cluster specificity using an empirical Bayes regression-based hypothesis testing procedure implemented in scABC 34 . For each peak, the cluster with lowest resulting p -value was chosen as reference cluster.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, most of the tools for single-cell analysis focus on specific analytical problems instead of providing an end-to-end workflow from alignment to post-clustering annotations. For example, SC3 [ 19 ] and SNNCliq [ 20 ] are developed for scRNA-seq clustering, scde [ 21 ] and MAST [ 22 ] for differential expression, scABC [ 23 ] and cisTopic [ 24 ] for scATAC-seq clustering, and chromVAR [ 25 ] and Cicero [ 26 ] for quantifying the chromatin accessibility at transcription regulator and gene level, respectively. Even pipelines with multiple functions, such as Monocle [ 27 ], Seurat [ 28 ], and Scanpy [ 29 ], lack the function to identify transcription regulators, which is crucial to understand the gene regulatory networks that regulate cell state transition and lineage determination [ 25 , 30 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%