2020 42nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine &Amp; Biology Society (EMBC) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/embc44109.2020.9176475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unsupervised 3D End-to-end Deformable Network for Brain MRI Registration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is some research on MRI registration using a deep learning algorithm, which may achieve better performance than traditional MRI registration methods. In the next step, we need to compare and analyze the registration results of these methods ( 38 , 39 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is some research on MRI registration using a deep learning algorithm, which may achieve better performance than traditional MRI registration methods. In the next step, we need to compare and analyze the registration results of these methods ( 38 , 39 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They further learned a meaningful metric for effective training of the registration network, using the discrimination network. Using a similar smooth loss, Zhu et al [51] designed an end-to-end network comprising affine alignment subnetwork and deformable subnetwork, which did not require an additional preprocessing of affine registration before registration. Similarly, Fu et al [52] proposed a LungRegNet based on two GAN-based networks to register lung CT images from coarse to fine, where the adversarial network in GANs was used to enforce additional DVF regularisation.…”
Section: Smoothness Regularisermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, above methods require extra affine preregistration before their proposed deformable registration. To address this issue, some pyramidal and recursive models [17][18][19][20][21] have been proposed to estimate both the affine and deformable mapping from multiresolution or multistage feature maps. Unfortunately, similar to most unsupervised approaches, 15,16,22,23 these networks still only employed intensity-based similarity to optimize registration, but ignored the shape information for the constraint of registration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%