2021
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.103.032409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unsuitability of cubic phase gates for non-Clifford operations on Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill states

Abstract: With the Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill (GKP) encoding, Clifford gates and error correction can be carried out using simple Gaussian operations. Still, non-Clifford gates, required for universality, require non-Gaussian elements. In their original proposal, GKP suggested a particularly simple method of using a single application of the cubic phase gate to perform the logical non-Clifford T gate. Here we show that this cubic phase gate approach performs extraordinarily poorly, even for arbitrarily large amounts of s… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We analyze the performance of our scheme and find that it can work as an almost ideal T gate with high fidelity 1. In contrast, when using the cubic phase gate as the T gate based on GKP's original proposal, the fidelity saturates at 0.78 [23]. We also find that this fidelity can be improved to 0.95 by optimizing the gains of the cubic phase gate and other Gaussian gates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We analyze the performance of our scheme and find that it can work as an almost ideal T gate with high fidelity 1. In contrast, when using the cubic phase gate as the T gate based on GKP's original proposal, the fidelity saturates at 0.78 [23]. We also find that this fidelity can be improved to 0.95 by optimizing the gains of the cubic phase gate and other Gaussian gates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…In the GKP's original paper, the case of c 0 = 1 2 , c 1 = 1 4 , c 2 = − 1 2 was proposed [15]. The fidelity of this case is plotted as a blue line and it saturates ∼0.78 [23]. We find that the fidelity can be improved by optimizing the gains (details about the optimization are given in supplementary material…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations