2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-016-4410-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unstuck in time: episodic future thinking reduces delay discounting and cigarette smoking

Abstract: The effects of EFT on delay discounting generalize to smokers; EFT also reduces laboratory-based cigarette self-administration. Potential mechanisms of EFT's effects are discussed as well as implications of EFT for clinical treatment of substance-use disorders.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

18
236
2
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 232 publications
(268 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
18
236
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Engagement in EFT induces activation in regions previously associated with DD (i. e., lateral prefrontal cortices, anterior cingulate, and parietal cortex) and also increases coupling in regions of the amygdala and hippocampus not usually associated with DD, as determined from fMRI activity [31]. EFT has previously been shown to decrease DD in individuals with alcholol use disorder [32], smokers [33], as well as normal weight, overweight, and obese populations [34,35]. Consistent with the reinforcer pathology concept, EFT may reduce the demand for hypothetical drinks [32], self-administration of cigarettes [33], and self-administration and valuation of highly palatable snacks in overweight and/or obese adults and children [35,36].…”
Section: Reinforcer Pathology As a Prototype ‘Biomarker’mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Engagement in EFT induces activation in regions previously associated with DD (i. e., lateral prefrontal cortices, anterior cingulate, and parietal cortex) and also increases coupling in regions of the amygdala and hippocampus not usually associated with DD, as determined from fMRI activity [31]. EFT has previously been shown to decrease DD in individuals with alcholol use disorder [32], smokers [33], as well as normal weight, overweight, and obese populations [34,35]. Consistent with the reinforcer pathology concept, EFT may reduce the demand for hypothetical drinks [32], self-administration of cigarettes [33], and self-administration and valuation of highly palatable snacks in overweight and/or obese adults and children [35,36].…”
Section: Reinforcer Pathology As a Prototype ‘Biomarker’mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EFT has previously been shown to decrease DD in individuals with alcholol use disorder [32], smokers [33], as well as normal weight, overweight, and obese populations [34,35]. Consistent with the reinforcer pathology concept, EFT may reduce the demand for hypothetical drinks [32], self-administration of cigarettes [33], and self-administration and valuation of highly palatable snacks in overweight and/or obese adults and children [35,36]. Conversely, when smokers or obese individuals were exposed to a scarcity scenario (drastic income reduction), they discounted more (valued the future less) and drug craving and valuation of preferred foods increased [36].…”
Section: Reinforcer Pathology As a Prototype ‘Biomarker’mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If effective in reducing delay discounting, employing only one cue would further reduce time required for intervention and increase EFT’s ease of use in research and clinical settings. For all comparisons, we used episodic recent thinking (ERT) as a control condition, a commonly used method in which participants imagine real events that occurred in the recent past (e.g., Lin & Epstein 2014; Stein et al 2016). This ERT condition serves to isolate the effects of prospection in EFT by ensuring that episodic thinking in both groups engages memory, features personal details, and is matched for vividness.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The degree to which individuals discount future consequences is in part a function of individual differences (e.g., genetic influences, Anokhin, Golosheykin, Grant, & Heath, 2011; neurocognitive influences, McClure, Laibson, Loewenstein, & Cohen, 2004; Peper, Koolschijn, & Crone, 2013), as well as environmental influences (e.g., Odum, 2011a, b; Stein, Wilson, Koffarnus, Daniel, Epstein & Bickel, 2016). If similar underlying processes drive monetary delay discounting and air quality delay discounting, targeting the same underlying processes may help reduce delay discounting on a global scale (see Odum, 2011a, b for discussion).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%