2008
DOI: 10.2514/1.34681
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unstructured-Mesh Discretizations and Solvers for Computational Aerodynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
1
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
58
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Unstructured mesh methods for computational fluid dynamics have been under development for over 25 years [8]. The original attraction of this approach was based on the success achieved in handling complex geometries, as demonstrated through finite-element-based approaches, mainly in the field of structural analysis.…”
Section: Numerical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unstructured mesh methods for computational fluid dynamics have been under development for over 25 years [8]. The original attraction of this approach was based on the success achieved in handling complex geometries, as demonstrated through finite-element-based approaches, mainly in the field of structural analysis.…”
Section: Numerical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original attraction of this approach was based on the success achieved in handling complex geometries, as demonstrated through finite-element-based approaches, mainly in the field of structural analysis. In addition to the flexibility in dealing with complex geometries, the ability to easily incorporate adaptive mesh refinement (AMR) strategies also became one of the often quoted advantages of the unstructured mesh approach [8].…”
Section: Numerical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vertex-based code on the other hand performs a larger amount of calculations when fluxes are computed, comparing the number of edges to each node with the number of cell neighbors of one cell (Mavriplis, 2007 …”
Section: Description Of the Cfd Codesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second order dissipation coefficient, which is multiplied with a pressure switch (in order to activate it only in regions where necessary), is set to 0.5 and the fourth order to 0.02. It is important to introduce a small enough level of artificial dissipation, while retaining a converging solution, from an accuracy point of view (Mavriplis, 2007). The turbulent quantities are discretized with a second order up-wind scheme.…”
Section: Edgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the advantages of the method are a compact scheme stencil, easy parallel implementation of the scheme, and flexibility in choice of a computational mesh. The above advantages make a higher order DG scheme potentially attractive for industrial CFD applications and in recent years the method received a lot of attention in the literature [6,33,35,36]. In the past decade the intensive study of DG methods has been performed in Central Aerohydrodynamic Institute (TsAGI) in Russia in collaboration with the NUMECA International [49,50,52].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%