2019 IEEE/ACS 16th International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications (AICCSA) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/aiccsa47632.2019.9035282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unstructured Medical Text Classification using Linguistic Analysis: A Supervised Deep Learning Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The development of SBD is probably the same [27] . For the SBD task, researchers mainly investigate new features and models that effectively discriminate between boundaries or non-boundaries [28,29] . Researchers have adopted Decision Trees (DTs), MLP, HMM, Maximum Entropy (ME), and CRF to study SBD [30,31] .…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The development of SBD is probably the same [27] . For the SBD task, researchers mainly investigate new features and models that effectively discriminate between boundaries or non-boundaries [28,29] . Researchers have adopted Decision Trees (DTs), MLP, HMM, Maximum Entropy (ME), and CRF to study SBD [30,31] .…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental results of Tibetan on SBD (L), SBD (B), and SBD (R) models. ) 96 29. 93.21 96.10 94.63 96.89 94.32 96.67 95.48 97.07 94.56 96.94 95.74 97.09 94.61 96.98 95.78 Bi-LSTM (L) 96.37 93.82 95.61 94.71 96.63 94.78 96.28 95.53 97.12 94.39 97.32 95.83 97.11 94.61 97.04 95.81 GRU (L) 93.88 88.67 94.01 91.26 95.18 90.73 95.60 93.10 95.22 92.47 93.56 93.01 95.01 91.53 94.03 92.76 Bi-GRU (L) 95.71 92.65 94.92 93.77 94.76 90.47 94.55 92.47 87.36 81.04 82.00 81.52 93.21 86.74 94.48 90.45 ) 70.39 64.15 29.28 40.21 71.47 67.15 31.52 42.91 71.71 65.45 35.60 46.12 72.00 68.46 32.72 44.28 Bi-LSTM (R) 70.47 66.03 27.05 38.38 71.40 65.96 32.83 43.84 71.69 64.98 36.27 46.55 71.91 67.53 33.51 44.79 GRU (R) 70.45 65.20 28.08 39.25 70.66 71.20 23.01 34.78 68.82 63.11 19.99 30.37 68.74 76.68 11.58 20.12 Bi-GRU (R) 70.17 61.41 33.01 42.94 70.31 76.19 18.43 29.68 69.84 72.60 18.14 29.03 69.72 76.07 15.97 26.40 MLP (R) 68.91 81.34 11.11 19.55 67.90 61.14 15.32 24.51 68.30 66.04 13.95 23.03 68.21 65.49 13.73 22.69…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), which simplifies access to content and reduces the time for retrieving information. NLP algorithms has shown promising results in clinical text classification such as classification of online medical articles(Al-Doulat et al, 2019), and smoking status classification and proximal femur (hip) fracture classification from the clinical notes and radiology reports(Wang et al, 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%