Proceedings of the 14th International Meshing Roundtable
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-29090-7_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unstructured Computational Meshes for Subdivision Geometry of Scanned Geological Objects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sluiter and Hansen's work was later revisited and revised by many including Talbert and Parkinson [10] and Sarrate and Huerta [11]. Mezentsev et al [12] described a generic approach to unstructured mesh generation on subdivision geometry. Berzin et al [13] developed in recent years a subdivision technique based on Modified Butterfly interpolation scheme for triangular mesh generation.…”
Section: Subdivision Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Sluiter and Hansen's work was later revisited and revised by many including Talbert and Parkinson [10] and Sarrate and Huerta [11]. Mezentsev et al [12] described a generic approach to unstructured mesh generation on subdivision geometry. Berzin et al [13] developed in recent years a subdivision technique based on Modified Butterfly interpolation scheme for triangular mesh generation.…”
Section: Subdivision Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Two approaches are commonly used to simulate non-spherical particles. One approach is grouping several spherical particles to form various particles in different shapes [20,21,24,25], while the other approach is generating non-round particles for 2D modeling and non-spherical particles for 3D modeling directly [26][27][28]. Rothenburg and Bathurst adopted 2D elliptical particles for DEM simulation, and their results showed that these particles have different strength characteristics than circular disks [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%