SAE Technical Paper Series 1992
DOI: 10.4271/920202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unsteady-Wake Analysis of the Aerodynamic Drag of a Notchback Model with Critical Afterbody Geometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is clear from the literature that the precise nature of the wake varies from vehicle to vehicle, but there seem to be a relatively small number of flow mechanisms that can exist in some combination or other-shear layer separations, longitudinal helical flows, vortex streets and a separation cavity (Vino et al, 2005;Sims-Williams et al, 2001;Nouzawa et al, 1992). All of these phenomena are subject to instabilities with Strouhal numbers (based on vehicle velocity and some representative frontal dimension) between 0.05 and 0.4.…”
Section: The Train Wakementioning
confidence: 96%
“…It is clear from the literature that the precise nature of the wake varies from vehicle to vehicle, but there seem to be a relatively small number of flow mechanisms that can exist in some combination or other-shear layer separations, longitudinal helical flows, vortex streets and a separation cavity (Vino et al, 2005;Sims-Williams et al, 2001;Nouzawa et al, 1992). All of these phenomena are subject to instabilities with Strouhal numbers (based on vehicle velocity and some representative frontal dimension) between 0.05 and 0.4.…”
Section: The Train Wakementioning
confidence: 96%
“…corresponds to the separation of a secondary vortex generated between the main trailing vortex and the c-pillar, while A 0 C represents the attachment of the main vortex. Nouzawa et al (1992) extended an earlier investigation with an unsteady analysis of a notchback model shape. They observed that an arch vortex (initially found on the rear window and deck-lid of an earlier study) exhibited significant unsteady characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In vehicle aerodynamics this method was used to characterize occurring flow structures and to derive the flow development [8,9,10,11]. Also the influence of the backlight angle, deck lid length or C Pillar length and radius onto the flow pattern was shown by many researchers, for instance [12,13,14,15,16]. But how these patterns are formed and under which conditions they occur is still an insufficiently answered question.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%