Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2005
DOI: 10.2514/1.6477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unsteady Trailing Vortex Evolution Behind a Wing In Ground Effect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At close ground proximity, the flow starts to interact with the ground, causing stagnation of the flow below the wing surface and as a result pressure increase (ram-pressure). At the same time, tip vortices are pushed out and reduce in size and strength with the descent into ground-effect (Han and Cho, 2005), resulting ultimately in superior aerodynamic efficiency in comparison to free-flight conditions. However, ground-effect induced stagnation of the flow below the wing results into an upwards diverted flow, causing earlier leading-edge flow separation on the upper side of the wing and therefore earlier wing stall, limiting the range of efficient angles-of-attack in GE (Rozhdestvensky, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At close ground proximity, the flow starts to interact with the ground, causing stagnation of the flow below the wing surface and as a result pressure increase (ram-pressure). At the same time, tip vortices are pushed out and reduce in size and strength with the descent into ground-effect (Han and Cho, 2005), resulting ultimately in superior aerodynamic efficiency in comparison to free-flight conditions. However, ground-effect induced stagnation of the flow below the wing results into an upwards diverted flow, causing earlier leading-edge flow separation on the upper side of the wing and therefore earlier wing stall, limiting the range of efficient angles-of-attack in GE (Rozhdestvensky, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Performance improvements result from a stagnation of the flow below the wings surface, causing a static pressure increase on the lower side of the wing (Vogt and Barber, 2012). As a result, more flow is not only diverted over the upper wing surface but also pushed out along the span direction, extending virtually the aspect-ratio of wings in ground-effect (Han and Cho, 2005). Consequently, the induced drag component can be reduced and leads ultimately to gains in aerodynamic efficiency of wings in ground-effect conditions (Ahmed and Sharma, 2005;Ahmed et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morky [11] developed a 2-dimensional algorithm (based on the constant vortex sheet method) for modeling the evolution and propagation of aircraft trailing vortices in a sheared environment near the ground. Han and Cho [12] investigated the unsteady evolution of trailing vortex sheets behind a wing in ground effect using a discrete vortex method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Han and Cho [12] assumed that the wings in close formation flight near the ground have the elliptic load distributions. Windall and Barrow [13] showed, based on a linear approach, that semi-elliptic wing planform with parabolic wing loading is optimal for a wing in ground effect for all aspect ratios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%