2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2012.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unsteady load on an oscillating Kaplan turbine runner

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, both our results and those of Karlsson et al have a similar overall trend. The magnitude of the added damping is in good agreement with the findings of Puolakka et al 20 at lower frequencies (5-70 Hz) but not at higher perturbation frequencies (.70 Hz). As the operating conditions and geometry of the turbines in these two studies differ from those in our case, differences in the results are expected.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Nonetheless, both our results and those of Karlsson et al have a similar overall trend. The magnitude of the added damping is in good agreement with the findings of Puolakka et al 20 at lower frequencies (5-70 Hz) but not at higher perturbation frequencies (.70 Hz). As the operating conditions and geometry of the turbines in these two studies differ from those in our case, differences in the results are expected.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…20 r, R, and U are the flow density, runner radius, and blade tip velocity, respectively. The added polar inertia is reasonably consistent with the study of Puolakka et al 20 There is a significant discrepancy between the findings of Karlsson et al 18 and our results, despite the similar qualitative behaviors. This discrepancy may be due to the smaller number of runner blades, lower head, and lower flow rate of the investigated turbine.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations