51st AIAA/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference 2015
DOI: 10.2514/6.2015-4191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unsteady Heat Transfer Analysis to Predict Combustor Wall Temperature in Rotating Detonation Engine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparison shown in Fig. 4 and as presented in Roy et al 8 with the 2-D model exhibit similar trends, however implementing the periodic gas temperature transients experienced by the outer body wall is a more logical approximation compared to a periodic heat flux boundary condition. Again it should be reiterated that the wall heat transfer coefficient used in convective boundary condition is expected to vary significantly within the entire combustor domain and be strongly influenced by wall temperature rise over time; however, it is kept constant for simplicity in the present study.…”
Section: Figure 2: Unwrapped Rde 2d Gas Temperature Profilesupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The comparison shown in Fig. 4 and as presented in Roy et al 8 with the 2-D model exhibit similar trends, however implementing the periodic gas temperature transients experienced by the outer body wall is a more logical approximation compared to a periodic heat flux boundary condition. Again it should be reiterated that the wall heat transfer coefficient used in convective boundary condition is expected to vary significantly within the entire combustor domain and be strongly influenced by wall temperature rise over time; however, it is kept constant for simplicity in the present study.…”
Section: Figure 2: Unwrapped Rde 2d Gas Temperature Profilesupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The first step is to carry out 3-D unsteady RANS simulation of the RDC flowfield using ANSYS-Fluent © up to stable detonation operation of 2-3 cycles. Details of the CFD mesh and simulation are provided in Roy et al 8 and therefore are not repeated here.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to IDDES studies, viscous and diffusive effects may be accounted for in unsteady RANS modelling [107] and facilitate the inclusion of detailed chemistry (see Section 5.4) with significantly lower computational overhead than IDDES or DNS. Such RANS models cannot, however, capture the turbulent fluctuations in the instantaneous flow-field, although there is evidence that they may be able to provide sufficient accuracy for parametric studies of mixing, detonation wave structure and loss mechanisms in RDEs [119,120]. The interactions between detonations, deflagration and viscous and thermal wall-effects add further complexity to producing RDE models which can accurately reproduce experimentally measured engine characteristics, although the computational resources may currently prohibit broad parametric studies using high fidelity modelling approaches.…”
Section: Turbulence Modelling In Rde Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…lant to overcome competing dissipative effects, such as the rapid expansion of the flow downstream (a flameout) [8][9][10] and heat transfer out of the combustion chamber [11][12][13].…”
Section: A Experiments Geometry and Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%