2011
DOI: 10.3327/jnst.48.677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unsteady Elbow Pipe Flow to Develop a Flow-Induced Vibration Evaluation Methodology for Japan Sodium-Cooled Fast Reactor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This accumulation of bubbles can increase the possibility of a bubble collision and subsequently alter the interfacial heat and mass transfers. Furthermore, when the curvature radius of an elbow is small enough to create a fluctuating flow after the elbow, the downstream pipe can undergo oscillating mechanical stress, which can lead to structural fatigue in the piping system (Yamano et al, 2009). In the past, several researchers have investigated turbulent flows in pipes with elbows by means of theoretical, experimental, and numerical methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This accumulation of bubbles can increase the possibility of a bubble collision and subsequently alter the interfacial heat and mass transfers. Furthermore, when the curvature radius of an elbow is small enough to create a fluctuating flow after the elbow, the downstream pipe can undergo oscillating mechanical stress, which can lead to structural fatigue in the piping system (Yamano et al, 2009). In the past, several researchers have investigated turbulent flows in pipes with elbows by means of theoretical, experimental, and numerical methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This experiment indicated no dependence on the pipe scale. (2) Since no dependence on the coolant velocity, viscosity and pipe scale was observed in these experiments, it can be concluded that there is no dependence on Reynolds number in the post-critical regime (from ~3 × 10 5 to ~8 × 10 6 ). Therefore, application to the JSFR hot-leg pipe condition (Re = ~4 × 10 7 ) is possible based on the assumption of analogy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%