2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2018.05.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unsteady behavior of oblique shock train and boundary layer interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More information can be found in Ref. 19. The stagnation pressure upstream in this study was set to approximately 607.9 kPa, and the stagnation temperature was set to 285 ± 1.5 K.…”
Section: Facility Description and Test Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More information can be found in Ref. 19. The stagnation pressure upstream in this study was set to approximately 607.9 kPa, and the stagnation temperature was set to 285 ± 1.5 K.…”
Section: Facility Description and Test Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mousavi et al [7] found that the changes in ramp dimension as a passive control method and wall temperature as an active control method could change the shock waves characteristics r and the length of the Lambda shock systems. Wang et al [8] reported that the behaviors of unsteady oblique shock train and boundary layer interactions are related to the dynamics of shock motion. The effects of cavity depth on shock train structure was studied by Kumar and Vaidyanathan [9] who showed that the strength of the shock train system decreases with an increase in the depth of the cavity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2012; Wang et al. 2018). Therefore, before developing a control scheme, the characteristics of the shock train, especially considering the effects of the SWBLI, should be analysed first.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the unstable motion caused by the SWBLI region may bring difficulty for shock train detection and location control. Although a successful closed-loop control has been implemented (Valdivia et al 2014;, the applicability of the control scheme to a highly distorted inlet, in which the shock train location is nonlinear, is still uncertain (Wagner et al 2010;Tan et al 2012;Wang et al 2018). Therefore, before developing a control scheme, the characteristics of the shock train, especially considering the effects of the SWBLI, should be analysed first.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%