2019
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-3460
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unstable Genome and Transcriptome Dynamics during Tumor Metastasis Contribute to Therapeutic Heterogeneity in Colorectal Cancers

Abstract: Purpose: Genomic and transcriptomic alterations during metastasis are considered to affect clinical outcome of colorectal cancers, but detailed clinical implications of metastatic alterations are not fully uncovered. We aimed to investigate the effect of metastatic evolution on in vivo treatment outcome, and identify genomic and transcriptomic alterations associated with drug responsiveness. Experimental Design: We developed and analyzed patientderived xenograft (PDX) models from 35 patients with colorectal ca… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A caveat to PDX models is that intratumoral evolution can occur during engraftment and passaging 11,2225 . Such evolution could potentially modify treatment response of PDXs with respect to the patient tumors 23,26,27 , particularly if the evolution were to systematically alter cancer-related genes. This issue is related to multi-region comparisons of patient tumors 2831 , for which local mutational and immune infiltration variations have suggested differential phenotypes among multi-region samples 32 .…”
Section: Mainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A caveat to PDX models is that intratumoral evolution can occur during engraftment and passaging 11,2225 . Such evolution could potentially modify treatment response of PDXs with respect to the patient tumors 23,26,27 , particularly if the evolution were to systematically alter cancer-related genes. This issue is related to multi-region comparisons of patient tumors 2831 , for which local mutational and immune infiltration variations have suggested differential phenotypes among multi-region samples 32 .…”
Section: Mainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, RNA sequencing can be used to study associations between genomic and transcriptomic alterations during tumor development, drug response and clinical outcome of patients. These changes can be associated with the development of drug resistance and differences in therapy outcomes (Cho et al, 2019). Whole transcriptome RNA sequencing can reveal the role of transcript deregulation and alternative splicing in malignant transformation and chemoresistance (De Laere et al, 2017;Goff et al, 2013) as described in Table 1.…”
Section: Rna Sequencingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other tools like next-generation sequencing (NGS) which has become irreplaceable in discovering mutations, gene expression and cancer biomarkers, offers a broad spectrum of possibilities for studying MDR (Chandana et al, 2019;Cho et al, 2019;Kyrochristos et al, 2019;Li et al, 2015aLi et al, , 2015b. In the last years, high throughput NGS technology revealed important findings regarding the genomic, epigenetic and transcriptomic diversity of cancers that otherwise would not be possible to acquire by standard histopathological analysis (Jiang et al, 2014;Teixeira et al, 2019;Turajlic et al, 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 Studies have now shown that tumor cells within the same tumor mass in an individual patient can also carry several different molecular alterations, referred to as intratumoral heterogeneity, contributing to drug resistance. 21,23,[27][28][29] Whole genome or exome sequencing of DNA from CRC has characterized a number of recurrent somatically mutated genes, such as APC, TP53, KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA, 30,31 affording the ability to perform targeted panel sequencing for liquid biopsies. Several studies have demonstrated that ctDNA profiling can accurately reproduce the genomic landscape of tumor tissue, 21,[32][33][34] and more specifically the detection of RAS mutations by ctDNA analysis has also been validated, demonstrating it to be a viable alternative to tissue-based RAS testing.…”
Section: Clinical Applications Of Ctdna In Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Tumor Genotypingmentioning
confidence: 99%