2005
DOI: 10.1080/00664670500282030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unsettling Ethnography: Tales of an ‘Ōiwi in the Anthropological Slot

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a white woman anthropologist, my goal is to build anthropological knowledge from Indigenous theorizing to see health anew. Working at the intersection of anthropology and Pacific studies, this means drawing from theory that lies outside of the anthropological canon because of the ways that Pacific studies scholars have often been alienated from anthropology (see Tengan, 2005; Trask, 1991). 10 Writing with Oceanic theory to situate movement as knowledge production is also a way to follow the legacy of Katherine Dunham (2006), as her work sought to affirm “the dignity and wisdom of black and brown bodies as knowing and profoundly human” (Roberts, 2014, 19).…”
Section: Theorizing With Oceanic Epistemologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a white woman anthropologist, my goal is to build anthropological knowledge from Indigenous theorizing to see health anew. Working at the intersection of anthropology and Pacific studies, this means drawing from theory that lies outside of the anthropological canon because of the ways that Pacific studies scholars have often been alienated from anthropology (see Tengan, 2005; Trask, 1991). 10 Writing with Oceanic theory to situate movement as knowledge production is also a way to follow the legacy of Katherine Dunham (2006), as her work sought to affirm “the dignity and wisdom of black and brown bodies as knowing and profoundly human” (Roberts, 2014, 19).…”
Section: Theorizing With Oceanic Epistemologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the project is collaborative from the outset, analysis happens throughout the research process, in relationship with the people we work with, and then the theorizing and the doing of research become less distinct between the ethnographer and the 'field'. The communities we work with and from can be part of the process of building ethnographic theory, and thus the knowledge creation processes become interrelated with our ethical conduct (Tengan, 2005). These ethics are rooted in a desire to produce accountable knowledge which is for the people rather than the neoliberal academy (Hammana & Klinkert, 2021).…”
Section: The Fourth Piece Of Firewood: Ethics Of Accountability Vs Reflexivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for many both in and outside of the discipline, this is not how it appears or feels. Instead, to many Indigenous scholars and to anthropologists such as Ifi Amadiume (1987) -it seemed anthropologists were mostly whites who came to 'observe' (or sneak around) and then write about Brown and Black people (Biolsi & Zimmerman, 1997;Harrison, 1997;Tengan, 2005;Trask, 1991). Whilst the discipline has mutated and created new missions for itself, especially since the reflexive turn, and now 'studies up', this does not negate the origins of its methodologies, or the tools that continue to be used by states and corporations to 'make sense of' or order those that reside in peripheries, yet to be 'modernized' (Khosravi, 2014).…”
Section: Decolonization Terminology and Anthropologymentioning
confidence: 99%