2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.07.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unselected low-risk pregnancies and the effect of continuous intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring on umbilical blood gases and cerebral palsy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
44
1
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
44
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Samejima, et al evaluated the relation among the heart rate pattern under CTG and umbilical blood gases and cerebral palsy. 26) They reported that the decreased variability of heart rate pattern correlated with decreased umbilical pH. They suggested that CP caused by intrapartum asphyxia was restricted under CTG.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Samejima, et al evaluated the relation among the heart rate pattern under CTG and umbilical blood gases and cerebral palsy. 26) They reported that the decreased variability of heart rate pattern correlated with decreased umbilical pH. They suggested that CP caused by intrapartum asphyxia was restricted under CTG.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy events are not limited to high-risk pregnancies. They may occur in about 50 % of the low-risk population [23], and thus is recommended in all high-risk deliveries. High-risk pregnancies are screened antenatally by fetal Doppler, biophysical profile, and CTG to identify at-risk fetuses which is confirmed by ABG analysis of cord blood immediately after birth.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, its systematic use has not turned into a reduction of cerebral palsy cases, but into an increase in C-section rates; there is also, no greater benefit with continuous monitoring of the fetal heart rate versus intermittent auscultation [21]. It seems that the issue is more with monitoring protocols and adequate assessment of the findings with one method or the other.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%