2014
DOI: 10.1109/taslp.2014.2377595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unsegmented Dialogue Act Annotation and Decoding with N-Gram Transducers

Abstract: The statistical models used for dialogue systems need annotated data (dialogues) to infer their statistical parameters. Dialogues are usually annotated in terms of Dialogue Acts (DA). The annotation problem can be attacked with statistical models, that avoid annotating the dialogues from scratch. Most previous works on automatic statistical annotation assume that the dialogue turns are segmented into the corresponding meaningful units. However, this segmentation is not usually available. Most recent works trie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dialogue act recognition task is actually composed of two sub-tasks: one for dialogue act segmentation and another for dialogue act classification. For practical application of dialogue act recognition systems, it is essential to perform both tasks, either in cascade [2] or jointly by augmenting the DA labels with BIO-like (Begin-Inside-Out) prefixes [28], or with N-Gram transducers [27]. However, it is also a common practice to assume that segmentation is given and to only classify the given segments.…”
Section: Dialogue Act Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dialogue act recognition task is actually composed of two sub-tasks: one for dialogue act segmentation and another for dialogue act classification. For practical application of dialogue act recognition systems, it is essential to perform both tasks, either in cascade [2] or jointly by augmenting the DA labels with BIO-like (Begin-Inside-Out) prefixes [28], or with N-Gram transducers [27]. However, it is also a common practice to assume that segmentation is given and to only classify the given segments.…”
Section: Dialogue Act Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However in the simple task, the accuracy of 0.720 repair onset prediction is respectable (comparable to (Georgila, 2009)), and is useful enough to allow realistic relative repair rates, in line with our motivation. The complex tagging system performs poorly on repairs compared to the literature, however the lack of segementation makes this a considerably harder task, in the same way as dialogue act tagging results are lower on unsegmented transcripts (Martínez-Hinarejos et al, 2015). Edit term detection performs very well at 0.918, approaching the state-of-the-art on Switchboard reported at 0.938 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The study using prosodic features focused on the prediction of the generic top level labels, while the study using textual features considered the combination of the multiple levels. Additionally, the latter study, as well as a more recent one [12], explored the recognition of dialog acts on unsegmented turns using n-gram transducers. However, in those cases, the focus was on the segmentation process.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%