2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unresponsive wakefulness or coma after cardiac arrest—A long-term follow-up study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
20
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…8 Nevertheless, reports of late recoveries from prolonged postcardiac arrest coma suggest that recovery of neuronal function can extend over much longer time periods. [11][12][13][14][15][16] The 3 patients with late recovery presented here all remained in coma for more than 2 weeks following cardiac arrest (17, 37, 30 days, respectively; see Fig 1 and Table 1) and yet achieved independent functional outcomes. In 2 patients (Patients 2 and 3), nonmedical reasons (ie, family wishes and logistical limitations of obtaining a legally authorized decision-maker) prohibited withdrawal of lifesustaining therapy; in the third patient (Patient 1), knowledge of the outcomes and clinical profiles of these first 2 patients provided the basis for the prolonged wait period to allow late emergence from coma (see Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…8 Nevertheless, reports of late recoveries from prolonged postcardiac arrest coma suggest that recovery of neuronal function can extend over much longer time periods. [11][12][13][14][15][16] The 3 patients with late recovery presented here all remained in coma for more than 2 weeks following cardiac arrest (17, 37, 30 days, respectively; see Fig 1 and Table 1) and yet achieved independent functional outcomes. In 2 patients (Patients 2 and 3), nonmedical reasons (ie, family wishes and logistical limitations of obtaining a legally authorized decision-maker) prohibited withdrawal of lifesustaining therapy; in the third patient (Patient 1), knowledge of the outcomes and clinical profiles of these first 2 patients provided the basis for the prolonged wait period to allow late emergence from coma (see Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…However, following the widespread use of TTM, an increasing number of reports describe unexpected recoveries despite evidence of poor prognostic markers. [11][12][13][14][15][16] In addition, a lack of imaging-based evidence of anoxic cortical or white matter injuries after cardiac arrest may portend better outcomes, 17 even in patients remaining in coma for more than 7 days. 18 The poorly characterized physiological protective factors related to TTM 19 suggest the possibility that in comatose post-cardiac arrest patients with wide preservation of cerebral structure, some negative predictive markers may only indicate a sustained abnormal state of global neuronal functions without permanent loss of potential to recover integrative cerebral functions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A total of 132 patients were potentially eligible, and 81 were included in the analyses (Figure 1). For 84% of them, aneurysm was treated by coiling within a median (IQR) of 14 h [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. At ICU admission, 56 patients had an M-GCS of 6, among whom 53 had an M-GCS of 6 both at admission and on day 3; three patients worsened within 3 days (two had hydrocephalus requiring EVD and the third was intubated for respiratory disorder; none had re-bleeding or aneurysm treatment complications).…”
Section: Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the presence of a cerebral edema on computed tomography (CT) images, graded using the subarachnoid hemorrhage early brain edema score (SEBES), or the extent of fluid attenuation inversion recovery (FLAIR) hypersignals on magnetic resonance imaging, are predictors of long-term disability and DCI occurrence [6,7,14]. Systemic biomarkers have also been evaluated to rate the burden of brain injury, such as the neuron specific enolase (NSE) following cardiac arrest [15,16]. However, in hemorrhagic stroke, astrocytic markers are better biomarkers of the primary hemorrhagic lesion [17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%