Introduction
Hepatic artery infusion pump (HAIP) placement is associated with improved outcomes in the treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). In this study, we examined outcomes following robotic HAIP placement, which were compared with open and laparoscopic placement.
Methods
A retrospective review of HAIP placements by 2 surgeons at a single institution was carried out from a prospectively maintained institutional cancer database. The institutional review board approved this HIPAA-compliant study. All statistical tests were 2-sided and p < 0.05 was considered significant.
Results
There were a total of 53 open HAIP cases, 21 laparoscopic cases, and 24 robotic cases. There were no statistically significant differences between the 3 groups in gender, age, body mass index, aberrant arterial anatomy, disease process being treated, or prior treatment, including chemotherapy, or prior abdominal or hepatic surgical intervention (p > 0.05). Robotic HAIP placement was associated with a significantly lower conversion rate to open operation than laparoscopic pump placement (17 vs. 67%; p = 0.0009). When cases with concomitant resections were excluded, there was a trend towards shorter median length of hospital stay with robotic pump placement compared with open and laparoscopic placement (4 vs. 5 vs. 5 days, respectively; p = 0.09). Complication rates were equivalent among the 3 groups when concomitant resections were excluded.
Conclusion
Robotic HAIP placement is a safe minimally-invasive procedure that is associated with a significantly lower conversion rate to open operation compared with laparoscopic placement and a trend towards shorter hospitalization compared to open.