2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.07.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unreliable Evoked Responses in Autism

Abstract: Summary Autism has been described as a disorder of general neural processing, but the particular processing characteristics that might be abnormal in autism have mostly remained obscure. Here, we present evidence of one such characteristic: poor evoked response reliability. We compared cortical response amplitude and reliability (consistency across trials) in visual, auditory, and somatosensory cortices of high-functioning individuals with autism and controls. Mean response amplitudes were statistically indist… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

42
286
6
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 271 publications
(335 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
42
286
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To the extent that a Bayesian prior accurately reflects the statistics of the world, it will improve task performance by reducing the number of probable stimuli. As such, an attenuated prior in autism could potentially increase behavioral sensitivity to sensory noise, as well as increase variability in stimulus-driven neural activity, both of which are consistent with recent findings on the disorder (47,48). We next simulate how Bayesian priors can be implemented through divisive normalization, establishing a link between alterations in neural computation and high-level hypotheses about how autism affects the ability to perform statistical inference.…”
Section: Simulation 3: Neural Implementation Of Bayesian Priorssupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To the extent that a Bayesian prior accurately reflects the statistics of the world, it will improve task performance by reducing the number of probable stimuli. As such, an attenuated prior in autism could potentially increase behavioral sensitivity to sensory noise, as well as increase variability in stimulus-driven neural activity, both of which are consistent with recent findings on the disorder (47,48). We next simulate how Bayesian priors can be implemented through divisive normalization, establishing a link between alterations in neural computation and high-level hypotheses about how autism affects the ability to perform statistical inference.…”
Section: Simulation 3: Neural Implementation Of Bayesian Priorssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Given the statistical properties of spiking neural activity (79), this result also predicts greater trial-by-trial response variability in autism. Evidence supporting these predictions comes from imaging studies reporting larger stimulus-driven response amplitudes (80) or increased variance (47) in autism, as well as recent psychophysical findings (81). In one imaging study, increased stimulus-driven activity in auditory cortex associated with lowlevel feature processing was observed in subjects with autism compared to typically developing controls (82).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Interestingly, it has recently been suggested that increased visual responsiveness to low‐level features, as reported in this study, may arise due to a larger noise in the primary visual system (Simmons et al, 2009; Lawson, Rees, & Friston, 2014). Along those lines, a larger intra‐individual variability of the evoked visual response has been reported in ASD (Dinstein et al, 2012; Haigh, Heeger, Dinstein, Minshew, & Behrmann, 2015). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a family of neurodevelopmental disorders with a wide range of sensory and socio-emotional deficits (Chiu, et al, 2008; Dinstein, et al, 2012; Happe, et al, 2006). Empathy, the ability to vicariously share feelings of others, is an important social-emotional faculty (Gu, et al, 2010; Moriguchi, et al, 2007) and is compromised in individuals with ASD (Baron-Cohen and Wheelwright, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%