1977
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(77)80730-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unreliability of the oral iron absorption test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study also indicates that control of disease activity is essential if a subject with active inflammation is to respond to oral iron supplementation. Further work is necessary to determine whether the oral iron absorption test and serum IL‐6 level can predict a priori which IBD subjects will respond to iron supplementation and whether higher doses of ferrous sulfate can overcome the reduced absorption seen with the dose used in this study, as suggested by Lanzkowsky et al35 in children without IBD. Additional limitations of our study were the small sample size, lack of repeated measures, potential variations in the timing of urine processing, and the wide standard deviation in PCDAI among patients with active disease 20…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This study also indicates that control of disease activity is essential if a subject with active inflammation is to respond to oral iron supplementation. Further work is necessary to determine whether the oral iron absorption test and serum IL‐6 level can predict a priori which IBD subjects will respond to iron supplementation and whether higher doses of ferrous sulfate can overcome the reduced absorption seen with the dose used in this study, as suggested by Lanzkowsky et al35 in children without IBD. Additional limitations of our study were the small sample size, lack of repeated measures, potential variations in the timing of urine processing, and the wide standard deviation in PCDAI among patients with active disease 20…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%