Summary. Early bone marrow transplant is now standard treatment for infants with severe immunode®ciencies such as Wiskott±Aldrich Syndrome (WAS), but results in older children and adults are poor. Non-myeloablative transplant has shown promise in the treatment of older children, who are likely to have active infections and organ damage. We describe a non-myeloablative transplant of a 26-year-old man with WAS, undertaken because of severe infections and vasculitis. Partial engraftment and immunorestoration were achieved. The patient is well 1 year post transplantation.Keywords: immunological de®ciency syndromes, Wiskott± Aldrich syndrome, vasculitis, bone marrow transplantation, transplantation chimaera.A 26-year-old man with Wiskott±Aldrich Syndrome (WAS) had recurrent bacterial respiratory tract infections and bronchiectasis, despite intravenous immunoglobulin (i.v. Ig) replacement. Two years previously, he had undergone splenectomy to treat life-threatening thrombocytopenia and had subsequently developed antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-negative necrotizing vasculitis. Smalland medium-sized arteries of the intestinal tract and kidneys were affected, with aneurysmal dilatation and massive haemorrhage. Corticosteroids (prednisolone 30 mg/d) and cyclophosphamide (50 mg´3/d) were required. Full details have previously been published (McCluggage et al, 1999). At the age of 25 years, he suffered Pneumocystis pneumonia, requiring ventilatory support.Because of severe immunode®ciency and high risk of Epstein±Barr virus (EBV)-related malignancy, conferred by WAS and cyclophosphamide treatment, the patient was assessed for bone marrow transplantation. There was no suitable related donor but an unrelated donor, mismatched at a single Cw locus, was available. Computerized tomography of the lungs con®rmed severe bronchiectasis.Because of frequent infections and pre-existing lung damage, we felt that conditioning associated with conventional regimens would not be tolerated. Therefore the patient was conditioned according to a non-myeloablative protocol, namely anti-CD52 (CAMPATH-1H, 10 mg, d )10 to )6),¯udarabine (25 mg/m 2 , d )6 to )2) and cyclophosphamide (1 g/m 2 , d )3 and )2 with MESNA). The donor was EBV seropositive and the patient EBV indeterminate, as he was receiving i.v. Ig. EBV-speci®c cytotoxic T-lymphocytes were generated in vitro from the bone marrow donor, for use in case of EBV-associated lymphoproliferation (Haque & Crawford, 1999). The transplant (d 0) was red cell-depleted bone marrow; 1´10 6 CD34 + cells/kg recipient weight. Cyclosporine was given from d )1 for graftversus-host prophylaxis.Penicillin V, cotrimoxazole and i.v. Ig (at an increased dose of 0á4 g/kg weekly) were continued. Valaciclovir, itraconazole, cipro¯oxacin and colistin were commenced as viral, fungal and bacterial prophylaxis respectively.
RESULTSThere was early regeneration of all cell lines with neutrophil numbers above 1´10 9 /l at d 8. However, invasive bacterial infections occurred from the day of the transplant. Infe...