SAE Technical Paper Series 1978
DOI: 10.4271/780592
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unregulated Emissions from a PROCO Engine Powered Vehicle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1980
1980
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Diesel vehicle exhaust particulate samples were collected on a chassis dynamometer/dilution tube facility (26). The vehicles, a 1979 2.3-L Opel and a 1980 2.3-L Peugeot, were run, using no.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diesel vehicle exhaust particulate samples were collected on a chassis dynamometer/dilution tube facility (26). The vehicles, a 1979 2.3-L Opel and a 1980 2.3-L Peugeot, were run, using no.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dilution-tube sampling of vehicle emissions is widely used in the .S. (23)(24)(25)(26)(27). The technique is designed to simulate as closely as possible the dilution of vehicle exhaust as it would occur during the first minute or two in ambient air from vehicles on the road.…”
Section: Sampling Of Vehicle Exhaustmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 diesel fuel. The base stock, which contained 0.0087 wt % S, was doped with di-tert-butyl disulfide to two additional fuel sulfur levels: 0.110 and 0.190 wt % S. Each fuel sulfur level was tested with and without the additive manufacturer's recommended level of 0.25 vol % of Lubrizol 556 (which, by fuel analysis, gave 0.058 wt % Ba in the fuel) to give the following six fuel sulfur/barium additive All measurements were made using the chassis dynamometer/dilution tube system previously described (11,12). The dilution tube flow rate was approximately 17 m3/min (600 cfm) for all experiments.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%