1994
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.78.10.736
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unrecognised and unregistered visual impairment.

Abstract: 40% (n=38). This study shows that there is unregistered visual impairment in patients attending ophthalmic departments. As registration triggers multidisciplinary support, ophthalmologists need to be more alert to the benefits and criteria for partial sight and blind registration. (BrJ Ophthalmol 1994; 78: 736-740)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
68
2
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
68
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Analyses of people eligible for blind and partial sight registration from attendees at ophthalmology departments in three centres in the UK have estimated that up to 50% of individuals eligible for blind or partial sight registration are not registered. 32,40,41 These studies were consistent in their findings that people eligible for partial sight registration were less likely to be registered than people eligible for blind registration. People with visual field loss alone were less likely to be registered than people with impaired central visual acuity, and people undergoing long-term treatment and follow-up were less likely to be registered or have registration delayed compared with people with a condition that was untreatable and not under long-term follow-up, for example age-related macular degeneration.…”
Section: Burden Of Disease In the Uksupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Analyses of people eligible for blind and partial sight registration from attendees at ophthalmology departments in three centres in the UK have estimated that up to 50% of individuals eligible for blind or partial sight registration are not registered. 32,40,41 These studies were consistent in their findings that people eligible for partial sight registration were less likely to be registered than people eligible for blind registration. People with visual field loss alone were less likely to be registered than people with impaired central visual acuity, and people undergoing long-term treatment and follow-up were less likely to be registered or have registration delayed compared with people with a condition that was untreatable and not under long-term follow-up, for example age-related macular degeneration.…”
Section: Burden Of Disease In the Uksupporting
confidence: 67%
“…There has been much criticism regarding the validity and coverage of the data collected during BD8 certification. [10][11][12][13][14][15] It is almost certainly true that many people who are eligible for certification are not certified and that many people who are certified may not always satisfy the criteria for certification. It is important to note, however, that measures of vision are subject to considerable variability and there is often a very necessary delay between the onset of certifiable visual loss and the offer of certification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certification is voluntary and the limitations of using visual impairment certification data to provide incident data have been noted before. [11][12][13] Despite these limitations, certifications can be used as a marker of disease in a population and may also be used to evaluate the impact of a new intervention or treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%