“…Typically, the performances of MOFs are promising to solve challenges in critical industrial applications such as CO 2 capture, ,, flue gas scrubbing, − and natural gas (NG) and refinery off-gas (ROG) upgrading. − This critically calls for a systematic exploration of the stability of the best MOFs upon exposure to impurities present in the associated flue gas streams , such as H 2 O, H 2 S, SO x , and NO x , among others to meet the industry’s expectation in this field . While the stability of MOFs upon water adsorption is routinely assessed from both experimental − and modeling − standpoints, this is far to be the case under harsh conditions as for instance in the presence of acidic and basic species . Only a small fraction of MOFs promising for CO 2 capture and natural gas or biogas purification has been tested in terms of stability upon exposure to NO x , SO x , H 2 S, and NH 3 . − Specifically, related to H 2 S, while a series of MOFs have been envisaged for the capture of this highly toxic molecule, ,,,− such as MIL-53(Al, Cr) and MIL-47(V), , soc-MOF, kag-MOF-1, MIL-125(Ti), UiO-66, Mg-CUK-1, MIL-53(Al)-FA, MFM-300(Sc), and MIL-53(Al)-TDC, the H 2 S stability of only a very few promising MOFs for the applications mentioned above, e.g., KAUST-7, KAUST-8, kag-MOF-1, soc-MOF, MIL-125(Ti), and MOF-74(Ni), has been verified.…”