Lutetium zoning in garnet within eclogites from the Zermatt-saas Fee zone, Western Alps, reveal sharp, exponentially decreasing central peaks. they can be used to constrain maximum Lu volume diffusion in garnets. A prograde garnet growth temperature interval of ~450-600 °c has been estimated based on pseudosection calculations and garnet-clinopyroxene thermometry. the maximum pre-exponential diffusion coefficient which fits the measured central peak is in the order of D 0 = 5.7*10 -6 m 2 /s, taking an estimated activation energy of 270 kJ/mol based on diffusion experiments for other rare earth elements in garnet. this corresponds to a maximum diffusion rate of D (~600 °c) = 4.0 Introduction the closure temperature, t c , has been defined by Dodson (1973) to be "the temperature at the time corresponding to its apparent age". It is dependant on the diffusion rate, the cooling rate, grain size, and grain shape. Following Dodson (1973) for spherical minerals one obtains:(1) (Q = activation energy; r = universal gas constant, A = numerical geometry factor, D 0 = diffusion coefficient at infinitely high temperatures, r = radius, dt/dt = cooling rate). In terms of geochronology, the mineral specific t c determines, among other factors, whether its age represents the timing of mineral crystallization or whether it corresponds to an age where a particular isotope geochronometer was closed.Garnet geochronology is particularly useful for systems such as sm-Nd and Lu-Hf because this mineral has high 147 sm/ 144 Nd and 176 Lu/ 177 Hf ratios (e.g. Mezger et al. 1992;Duchêne et al. 1997). the stability relations of garnet are generally well understood, hence constraints can be placed on the age(s) of specific P-t conditions at which the mineral grew (e.g. Lapen et al. 2003;Whitehouse & Platt 2003) provided garnet has not been heated beyond its t c . Most t c studies so far concern sm-Nd garnet geochronology because diffusion experiments exist for sm and/or Nd in garnet (Harrison & Wood 1980;coghlan 1990;Ganguly et al. 1998; Van Orman et al. 2002;tirone et al. 2005). However, published estimates for sm-Nd t c ' span a large range in temperature from around 500 °c (e.g. Mezger et al. 1992) to around 800 °c (e.g. Jagoutz 1988). Not much is known about the t c of the Lu-Hf system, and, to our knowledge, no Lu and Hf diffusion data in garnet have been determined. In general, Lu-Hf ages have been found to give older ages when compared to sm-Nd ages. scherer et al. (2000) Geosci. 101 (2008) their high grade rocks this is likely due to a higher t c for the Lu-Hf, compared to the sm-Nd system. Lapen et al. (2003) interpreted a similar age difference in lower temperature rocks to reflect prograde zoning, based on the fact that Lu, in contrast to sm, will be strongly partitioned into garnet and hence, will be concentrated in the early grown core region. the knowledge whether prograde Lu-Hf zoning is preserved in a sample or not can be used to distinguish the two interpretations.1661-8726/08/030637-14 DOI 10.1007/s00015-008-...