2007
DOI: 10.1080/00268970601110316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unravelling the solvent response to neutral and charged solutes

Abstract: To cite this version:Maxim V Fedorov, Alexei A. Kornyshev. Unravelling solvent response to neutral and charged solutes. Molecular Physics, Taylor & Francis, 2007, 105 (01) In this article we discuss the effects of solute-water interactions with a focus on a set of old standing questions:• How strong is the nonlinear response of water polarisation to charged solute?• How strong is the asymmetry of the response between cations and anions of similar size?• What is the role of the finite size of the solute?• How '… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
119
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
(127 reference statements)
3
119
0
Order By: Relevance
“…26,27,51,65 However, since ε W (z) is not a monotonic but oscillating function of depth z, displaying both positive and negative values separated by sharp discontinuities within 0.5 nm of the interface, 29,[66][67][68] interfacial ion distributions should not be expected to be monotonic or even continuous functions of depth. 66 From this standpoint, relative ion affinities would reflect the dissimilar depths, z i , at which ions balance the electrodynamic forces driving them to the interface with the entropic losses associated with the creation of interfacial concentration gradients.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26,27,51,65 However, since ε W (z) is not a monotonic but oscillating function of depth z, displaying both positive and negative values separated by sharp discontinuities within 0.5 nm of the interface, 29,[66][67][68] interfacial ion distributions should not be expected to be monotonic or even continuous functions of depth. 66 From this standpoint, relative ion affinities would reflect the dissimilar depths, z i , at which ions balance the electrodynamic forces driving them to the interface with the entropic losses associated with the creation of interfacial concentration gradients.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 This procedure presents some clear conceptual difficulties, but, from the practical perspective, has also run into problems when applied to molecular-size objects 22,43 and to nanometer-scale liquid interfaces. 17,34 The deviations from the expected behavior are not limited to quantitative disagreements in calculated electrostatic energies, but reach the level of qualitative differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique is easy to implement but it suffers from poor convergence. 143,221,239 The more advanced methods that are most commonly used to solve OZ-type equations can be roughly classified into four general domains. In the first category there are methods based on…”
Section: 143238mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effect arises by indirect coupling of the correlations with solvent molecules since the ion-solvent and ion-ion interaction potentials are not altered a priori. The XRISM, ARISM, and DRISM methods have been used to study aqueous ionic solutions in both the infinite dilution regime 137,171,187,213,[217][218][219][220][221] and over a range of finite salt concentrations. 175,215,[222][223][224][225][226][227][228][229] These studies have used a number of different water and ion models at both ambient conditions 141,221 and at extreme temperatures, 225,226,228,229 pressures, 228,229 and concentrations.…”
Section: D Rismmentioning
confidence: 99%