Unravelling the sex- and age-specific impact of poaching mortality with multievent modeling

Abstract

Background Poaching is a prominent source of ‘hidden hurdles’, cryptic impacts of human activities that may hinder the conservation of animal populations. Estimating poaching mortality is challenging, as the evidence for illegal killing is not outwardly obvious. Using resighting and recovery data collected on 141 marked red deer Cervus elaphus within the Stelvio National Park (central Italian Alps), we show how multievent models allow to assess the direct impacts of illegal harvesting on age- and sex-specific survival, accounting for uncertainty over mortality causes. Results Mortality caused by poaching was consistently higher for males than for females in all age classes. In males, the probability of dying from poaching was higher for extreme age classes, while in females all age classes showed fairly similar values of poaching mortality. The strong bias in sex-specific poaching mortality was possibly due to trophy killing in adult males and ‘bushmeat-like’ killing for private or commercial gain in young males and in females. Conclusions A robust assessment of age- and sex-specific prevalence of poaching in wildlife populations is pivotal when illegal killing is of conservation concern. This provides timely information on what segment of the population is most likely to be affected. Besides obvious demographic consequences on small populations, age- and sex-biased poaching prevalence may contrast with the need to maintain ecosystem complexity and may alter behavioral responses to human presence. The information provided by multievent models, whose flexibility makes them adaptable to many systems where individual-based data is part of population monitoring, offers a support to design appropriate strategies for the conservation of wildlife populations. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12983-019-0321-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Opportunistic or Non-Random Wildlife Crime? Attractiveness Rather Than Abundance in the Wild Leads to Selective Parrot Poaching

“…Solving the dichotomy between opportunistic or selective poaching has profound conservation implications, since the overexploitation of preferred species may be causing their decline, pushing their populations toward regional [11,58] and global [84] extinctions. Several lines of evidence show that any form of harvesting (including legal fishing and hunting) is selective toward individuals of a certain sex, size, morphology, or behavior, with long-term population and evolutionary consequences [93][94][95][96][97][98][99]. However, to our knowledge, the hypothesis of selective harvest at the community level (i.e., on species with particular characteristics over others ) has not yet been properly tested, mainly due to the difficulty of assessing their availability in the wild.…”

Resource managers' and users' perspectives on factors contributing to unauthorised hunting in western Tanzania

“…For example, it is characterised by significant levels of overhunting that can deplete species to very low numbers and drive others to extinction (Bouché et al, 2011;Chase et al, 2016). It is also said to cause behavioural disruptions and sex biases in target species (Corlatti et al, 2019).…”

Quantifying poached wildlife mammal species in Center-western region of Cte dIvoire

“…Animals slaughtered without distinction of sex, age or physiological state exacerbated by a noticeable overexploitation preventing populations from rebuilding causes the extinction of species. In addition to demographic concern on small populations, age and sexbiased poaching prevalence may contrast sustainable ecosystem complexity (Corlatti et al, 2019). Our results also show that the rifle is the most used hunting tool in the center-west of the country.…”