2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085622
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unravelling the Diversity of Grapevine Microbiome

Abstract: Vitis vinifera is one of the most widely cultivated fruit crops with a great economic impact on the global industry. As a plant, it is naturally colonised by a wide variety of both prokaryotic and eukaryotic microorganisms that interact with grapevine, having either beneficial or phytopathogenic effects, who play a major role in fruit yield, grape quality and, ultimately, in the evolution of grape fermentation and wine production. Therefore, the objective of this study was to extensively characterize the natur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

23
254
3
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 243 publications
(284 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
23
254
3
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, fungal diversity in these 36 NZ vineyard soils appears much greater than estimates from just two Italian vineyards with around 300 MOTUs in Orgiazzi et al (2012), but one might expect greater diversity with a greater sampling area. Previous reports of fungal diversity found on vine bark derived from live culture only and yielded just five species (Sabate et al, 2002); however, next-generation sequencing of fungal communities from vine leaves reveals around a thousand MOTUs and is thus in line with our inferences from bark here (Pinto et al, 2014).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, fungal diversity in these 36 NZ vineyard soils appears much greater than estimates from just two Italian vineyards with around 300 MOTUs in Orgiazzi et al (2012), but one might expect greater diversity with a greater sampling area. Previous reports of fungal diversity found on vine bark derived from live culture only and yielded just five species (Sabate et al, 2002); however, next-generation sequencing of fungal communities from vine leaves reveals around a thousand MOTUs and is thus in line with our inferences from bark here (Pinto et al, 2014).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Direct sequencing of DNA from these niches reveals approximately the same extent of fungal diversity recovered from similar niches in the handful of other studies that have used this approach (Bokulich et al, 2014;Pinto et al, 2014;Taylor et al, 2014). These communities are not homogenous; they significantly vary in terms of species richness and community composition, and both niche and geographic location affect this variance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It should be noted that some yeast species found in grapes and must, like Aureobasidium pullulans or Cryptococcus amylolentus, are enzymatically interesting showing a wide range and intensity of hydrolytic activities but have a low incidence on fermentation development. A. pullulans dominates the microbial consortia of grape [25,26], however, its null fermentative power and its low adaptation to fermentative environment bias their contribution to the fermentation process, making their interest in winemaking scarce [27]. There is a simple method to minimize the isolation of this yeast-like fungus by keeping the fresh grape must refrigerated overnight in order to greatly reduce the Aureobasidium population.…”
Section: The Importance Of a Proper Isolation Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classical molecular technics like t-RFLP [31,32] or DGGE [25], genomic approaches [28,33,34] and metagenomic tools [26,35] are culture independent techniques, but we cannot forget the importance of microorganism cultures for their further study and industrial usage. Knowledge about the vineyard and fermentation microbiomes are growing notably in recent years [26,35,36], so now we have quite enough information about yeast abundance and distribution in both grapes and fermentations. However, information about comparative genomics of different yeast strains is scarce, even more in the case of non-Saccharomyces species.…”
Section: Population Study Rational Use Of Genomic Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%