2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.gr.2020.06.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unravelling the architecture and evolution of the inverted multi-stage North Iberian-Bay of Biscay rift

Abstract: This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
92
1
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
(110 reference statements)
3
92
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering all models tested, crustal thicknesses calculated by models 4 (Figure 5) and 5 (Figure 6) provided the best crustal-scale match with gravity inversion crustal thickness estimates and these will be discussed in greater detail. (Cadenas et al, 2020). Thus, these discrepancies with the results calculated by model 4 are interpreted to be a result of the assumption that all continental blocks are rigid and unable to experience deformation within deformable models built in GPlates.…”
Section: Comparison Of Deformable Plate Modeling and Gravity Inversion: Models 4 Andmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Considering all models tested, crustal thicknesses calculated by models 4 (Figure 5) and 5 (Figure 6) provided the best crustal-scale match with gravity inversion crustal thickness estimates and these will be discussed in greater detail. (Cadenas et al, 2020). Thus, these discrepancies with the results calculated by model 4 are interpreted to be a result of the assumption that all continental blocks are rigid and unable to experience deformation within deformable models built in GPlates.…”
Section: Comparison Of Deformable Plate Modeling and Gravity Inversion: Models 4 Andmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The reconstruction of the southern North Atlantic from Nirrengarten et al (2018) was the first to provide independent poles of rotation for the Landes High and Ebro Block, and the motivation for model 3 was simply to investigate the kinematic role of these continental blocks using a deformable plate modeling approach. Danois High is based upon recent seismic and potential field studies which interpret the Le Danois High as a rift-inherited basement block with a distinct evolution during extensional and compressional stages of deformation experienced along the North Iberian margin (Cadenas et al, 2018(Cadenas et al, , 2020. The geometry of the Le Danois High is the same as that defined in Cadenas et al (2018) and new poles of rotation for the Le Danois High are defined in this study.…”
Section: Model Specificsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The wedge increases in extension and depth toward the east (Fernández-Viejo et al, 2012). The compression was halted when the plate boundary migrated to the south in the actual Azores-Gibraltar zone.This fact makes the North Iberian Margin (NIM) one of the best examples where polyphase-multistage rifting and posterior reactivation processes can be investigated, as the later tectonic events did not obliterate completely the earlier extensional structures (Roca et al, 2011;Tugend et al, 2014;Cadenas et al, 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%