Unravelling Insurgent Groups' Strategy: The Case of the National Socialist Council of<i>Nagalim</i>in India

Goswami, Namrata

doi:10.1080/09700160802063350

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Many of the militia fight not merely the Indian state and seek greater autonomy or express the right to self-determination and unfinished agenda of decolonisation, 8 but also bitterly attack each other to ‘carve’ exclusive ethnic homelands (Arora & Kipgen, 2017; Biswas & Suklabaidya, 2008; Kolas, 2017). The unresolved Naga problem has strong political implications for perpetuating ethnic conflict in Manipur, as the insurgent Nagas are demanding Naga-inhabited areas to be partitioned from Manipur and included in Nagalim (Arora & Kipgen, 2017; Goswami, 2008). Fratricide and ethnic-nationalism are expressed simultaneously and without any trace of contradiction in many locales (Arora, 2013; Baruah, 1999; Bhonsle, 2016; Hazarika, 2018; Tarapot, 1993, 2003).…”

Section: Spaces Of Exception and Being Differentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Citizens, the Smoking Guns of AFSPA and Bare Life in Northeast India

Arora

2020

Sociological Bulletin

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

At the heart of ‘Indian nation-state making’ in the post-colonial context is dominant imagery and imaginary of Indian-ness, and there is an uncertain relationship between legitimate and illegitimate violence, and debate on integration and coercion of diverse nationalities in this state-nation. The ethnic nationalities of India’s Northeast have not been well integrated into the Indian imaginary and share a sense of belonging. Insurgency shapes the politics of this borderland and fuels secessionist aspirations and led to a demarcation of disturbed areas and exceptional citizens. Following Foucault and Agamben, I highlight the immense ‘unchecked’ sovereignty and biopolitical control of the Indian government to demarcate zones of democratic exception in Northeast India and enforce laws such as the Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA) to perpetuate its domination, militarise and radically decide on matters of life. The law is draconian in its implications and I review some of the extant literature that reveals the ‘bare life’ enjoyed by some Indian citizens. Integrating ethnographic voices from Manipur, this paper deepens our critical perspective on the AFSPA to understand its fundamental impact on everyday life and routine violence in Manipur and the consequent emigration of its citizens.

show abstract