2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10008-019-04381-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unraveling the role of binder concentration on the electrochemical behavior of mesocarbon microbead anode in lithium–ion batteries: understanding the formation of the solid electrolyte interphase

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite having lower R CT , the overall resistance of recovered Si−G is still higher than purchased Si−G as the R SEI of purchased Si−G is 11.52 Ω while that of recovered Si−G is 18.72 Ω. The higher overall resistance of recovered Si−G before and after cycling could be due to polymeric remnants originating from the solar panel waste, akin to how a higher concentration of polymeric binder leads to higher overall resistance [39] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite having lower R CT , the overall resistance of recovered Si−G is still higher than purchased Si−G as the R SEI of purchased Si−G is 11.52 Ω while that of recovered Si−G is 18.72 Ω. The higher overall resistance of recovered Si−G before and after cycling could be due to polymeric remnants originating from the solar panel waste, akin to how a higher concentration of polymeric binder leads to higher overall resistance [39] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher overall resistance of recovered SiÀ G before and after cycling could be due to polymeric remnants originating from the solar panel waste, akin to how a higher concentration of polymeric binder leads to higher overall resistance. [39] Rate performance of both purchased SiÀ G and recovered SiÀ G were compared in which both electrodes were subjected to different fixed current rates ranging from 100 to 2000 mA g À 1 . At 100 mA g À 1 , purchased SiÀ G demonstrated higher specific capacity at 638.62 mAh g À 1 whereas recovered SiÀ G has lower specific capacity at 538.80 mAh g À 1 (Figure 6d).…”
Section: Electrochemical Performance Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results indicate that the composite with CMC‐SBR has relatively the highest sodium diffusion coefficient which facilitates the enhanced kinetic capability. The highest sodium diffusion coefficient for CMC‐SBR binder can be associated with the tortuosity, which is a significant factor because of its effect on the electrolyte conductivity [39] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The highest sodium diffusion coefficient for CMC-SBR binder can be associated with the tortuosity, which is a significant factor because of its effect on the electrolyte conductivity. [39] The galvanostatic discharge-charge test with PVdF, CMC-SBR, and Alginate were performed at 135 mA • g À 1 within the voltage window of 0.1-3.0 V in Figures 4a, 4b, and 4c, respectively. Samples with each binder can deliver initial discharge capacity of nearly 800 mAh • g À 1 , which are greater than the theoretical capacity of Se.…”
Section: Chemelectrochemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…40 Zarie shows that by increasing binder in MCMB anode from 4.5 to 10% Warburg coefficient changes. 41 The highest diffusion coefficient was obtained at 7.5% of binder. Coating LFP by carbon decreases the Warburg coefficient as reported by Park.…”
Section: Effect Of Cb G and Pv On Warburg Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 92%