2020
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab7337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unraveling the Nature of the Deeply Embedded Wolf–Rayet Star WR 121a

Abstract: An X-ray study of a deeply embedded Wolf-Rayet star WR 121a has been carried out using long-term (spanning over ∼12 years) archival observations from Chandra and XMM-Newton. For the first time, a periodic variation with a period of 4.1 days has been detected in the X-ray light curve of WR 121a. No companion is seen in a merged and exposure corrected Chandra X-ray image of WR 121a as shown in the other previous observations in J-band. The X-ray spectrum of WR 121a has been well-explained by a thermal plasma emi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(83 reference statements)
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, even though the low state is likely related to periastron, the exact time of periastron passage cannot be determined with accuracy, given the available information on the system. We also clarify that in such a long period system, we can certainly reject the hypothesis of an eclipse of the CWR by one of the stars as observed in the short period massive binary WR 121a (Arora & Pandey 2020).…”
Section: X-ray Emissionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…As a result, even though the low state is likely related to periastron, the exact time of periastron passage cannot be determined with accuracy, given the available information on the system. We also clarify that in such a long period system, we can certainly reject the hypothesis of an eclipse of the CWR by one of the stars as observed in the short period massive binary WR 121a (Arora & Pandey 2020).…”
Section: X-ray Emissionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…X-ray observations have been made of all three systems (Gosset et al (2009), Skinner et al (2010), Raassen et al (2003), Pollock & Corcoran (2006)) and are summarised in Table C1. WR22 and WR25 have already been confirmed as binaries via RV studies, and both sources also appear to show orbitally modulated X-ray fluxes (Gosset et al (2009), Arora et al (2020)). WR22 is of particularly interest since it is observed to be particularly faint at the point at which the WNLha and associated wind might be expected to eclipse both the secondary and any associated wind interaction zone (𝐿 X ∼ 6.3 × 10 31 erg −1 ).…”
Section: Data Availabilitymentioning
confidence: 90%