2023
DOI: 10.1080/10106049.2023.2256308
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unraveling the evolution of landslide susceptibility: a systematic review of 30-years of strategic themes and trends

Aonan Dong,
Jie Dou,
Yonghu Fu
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…LSA indicates the landslide-prone areas that can be used by policy-makers, and general public to avoid catastrophic landslides. It represents a fundamental step toward assessing landslide hazards and developing mitigation strategies (Dong et al, 2023). Therefore, conducting landslide susceptibility modeling and mapping research is essential.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LSA indicates the landslide-prone areas that can be used by policy-makers, and general public to avoid catastrophic landslides. It represents a fundamental step toward assessing landslide hazards and developing mitigation strategies (Dong et al, 2023). Therefore, conducting landslide susceptibility modeling and mapping research is essential.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A commonly used ML algorithm in landslide susceptibility and hazard mapping is the Random Forest (RF) (e.g. Stumpf and Kerle 2011;Zhang et al 2020;Liu et al 2022;Dong et al 2023). In comparison with other ML algorithms, it also yields satisfying results (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applied models can be grouped into four categories: physical, heuristic, statistical, and machine learning [19]. Physical models require accurate site characterization and are more suitable for slope-scale analysis and mapping [20]. Heuristic methods mostly rely on expert knowledge and expertise, focusing on the importance of the field survey to prevent statistic bias, and can be used in areas where detailed geotechnical information and/or reliable, accurate, and complete landslide inventories are missing [21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%