2015
DOI: 10.1039/c5ra08790b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unraveling the coptisine–ctDNA binding mechanism by multispectroscopic, electrochemical and molecular docking methods

Abstract: This study provides evidences of coptisine–DNA intercalation, which may help to develop new efficient, safe probes for the fluorometric detection of DNA instead of traditional toxic and carcinogenic probes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(A), the absorption peak of ctDNA at 258 nm decreased gradually accompanied by a blue‐shift of about 2 nm with increasing concentration of 5‐HMF. The transfer of negative charge from 5‐HMF to ctDNA meant that the π–π* transition needed more energy, thus the absorption peak of ctDNA exhibited a mild blue‐shift (2 nm), and the binding between 5‐HMF and ctDNA caused a change of ctDNA structure accompanied by a decrease in the peak intensity . The binding constants ( K a ) between 5‐HMF and ctDNA at 292, 298, 304 and 310 K were determined according to the equation ΔA=Δϵ2·[()C5normalHMF,0+CctDNA,0+1Knormala]±C5HMF,0+CctDNA,0+1Ka24C5normalHMF,0CctDNA,0 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(A), the absorption peak of ctDNA at 258 nm decreased gradually accompanied by a blue‐shift of about 2 nm with increasing concentration of 5‐HMF. The transfer of negative charge from 5‐HMF to ctDNA meant that the π–π* transition needed more energy, thus the absorption peak of ctDNA exhibited a mild blue‐shift (2 nm), and the binding between 5‐HMF and ctDNA caused a change of ctDNA structure accompanied by a decrease in the peak intensity . The binding constants ( K a ) between 5‐HMF and ctDNA at 292, 298, 304 and 310 K were determined according to the equation ΔA=Δϵ2·[()C5normalHMF,0+CctDNA,0+1Knormala]±C5HMF,0+CctDNA,0+1Ka24C5normalHMF,0CctDNA,0 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The transfer of negative charge from 5-HMF to ctDNA meant that the -* transition needed more energy, thus the absorption peak of ctDNA exhibited a mild blue-shift (2 nm), and the binding between 5-HMF and ctDNA caused a change of ctDNA structure accompanied by a decrease in the peak intensity. 32 The binding constants (K a ) between 5-HMF and ctDNA at 292, 298, 304 and 310 K were determined according to the equation 33…”
Section: Analysis Of Binding Constant and Thermodynamic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular docking technique is one of the promising tools by placing a small molecule of drugs into the binding sites of the targeted macromolecules for rational drug designing and discovery. If the binding free energy is low, the potential of binding is more between the desired compound and the receptor (target).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[18] For dynamic quenching, the process increased temperatures and produce a faster diffusion leading to a larger dynamic quenching constant, however, higher temperatures result in dissociation of weakly bound complexes decreasing the quenching constant in the static quenching process. [18,19] To study this mechanism, we investigated the fluorescence quenching of cefalexin/cefixime to BSA at different temperatures (T = 292, 298, 304, and 310 K), using the Stern − Volmer equation.…”
Section: Fluorescence Spectroscopy Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%